Summary) The abstract should follow the structure of the article (relevance, degree of exploration of the problem, the goal, the main results, conclusion) and characterize the theoretical and practical significance of the study results. The abstract should not contain wording echoing the title, cumbersome grammatical structures and abbreviations. The text should be written in scientific style. The volume of abstracts (summaries) depends on the content of the article, but should not be less than 250 words. All abbreviations must be disclosed in the summary (in spite of the fact that they will be disclosed in the main text of the article), references to the numbers of publications from reference list should not be made. The sentences of the abstract should constitute an integral text, which can be made by use of the words “consequently”, “for example”, “as a result”. Avoid the use of unnecessary introductory phrases (eg, “the author of the article considers...”, “The article presents...” and so on.)

/pdf/ministry-of-education-and-science-of-the-russian-federation-7m2jn0xnm1.pdf

Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

We present Spider, a large-scale, complex and cross-domain semantic parsing and text-to-SQL dataset annotated by 11 college students. It consists of 10,181 questions and 5,693 unique complex SQL queries on 200 databases with multiple tables, covering 138 different domains. We define a new complex and cross-domain semantic parsing and text-to-SQL task where different complex SQL queries and databases appear in train and test sets. In this way, the task requires the model to generalize well to both new SQL queries and new database schemas. Spider is distinct from most of the previous semantic parsing tasks because they all use a single database and the exact same programs in the train set and the test set. We experiment with various state-of-the-art models and the best model achieves only 12.4% exact matching accuracy on a database split setting. This shows that Spider presents a strong challenge for future research. Our dataset and task are publicly available at this https URL

Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task

We consider the problem of parsing natural language descriptions into source code written in a general-purpose programming language like Python. Existing data-driven methods treat this problem as a language generation task without considering the underlying syntax of the target programming language. Informed by previous work in semantic parsing, in this paper we propose a novel neural architecture powered by a grammar model to explicitly capture the target syntax as prior knowledge. Experiments find this an effective way to scale up to generation of complex programs from natural language descriptions, achieving state-of-the-art results that well outperform previous code generation and semantic parsing approaches.

/pdf/a-syntactic-neural-model-for-general-purpose-code-generation-2pbjx09dar.pdf

A Syntactic Neural Model for General-Purpose Code Generation

Meaning Representation (AMR) is a semantic formalism for which a grow- ing set of annotated examples is avail- able. We introduce the first approach to parse sentences into this representa- tion, providing a strong baseline for fu- ture improvement. The method is based on a novel algorithm for finding a maxi- mum spanning, connected subgraph, em- bedded within a Lagrangian relaxation of an optimization problem that imposes lin- guistically inspired constraints. Our ap- proach is described in the general frame- work of structured prediction, allowing fu- ture incorporation of additional features and constraints, and may extend to other formalisms as well. Our open-source sys- tem, JAMR, is available at: http://github.com/jflanigan/jamr

/pdf/a-discriminative-graph-based-parser-for-the-abstract-meaning-3ijinqj3ge.pdf

A Discriminative Graph-Based Parser for the Abstract Meaning Representation

Semantically complex queries which include attributes of objects and relations between objects still pose a major challenge to image retrieval systems. Recent work in computer vision has shown that a graph-based semantic representation called a scene graph is an effective representation for very detailed image descriptions and for complex queries for retrieval. In this paper, we show that scene graphs can be effectively created automatically from a natural language scene description. We present a rule-based and a classifierbased scene graph parser whose output can be used for image retrieval. We show that including relations and attributes in the query graph outperforms a model that only considers objects and that using the output of our parsers is almost as effective as using human-constructed scene graphs (Recall@10 of 27.1% vs. 33.4%). Additionally, we demonstrate the general usefulness of parsing to scene graphs by showing that the output can also be used to generate 3D scenes.

/pdf/generating-semantically-precise-scene-graphs-from-textual-gsl4n2j20y.pdf

Generating Semantically Precise Scene Graphs from Textual Descriptions for Improved Image Retrieval

We describe Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR), a semantic representation language in which we are writing down the meanings of thousands of English sentences. We hope that a sembank of simple, whole-sentence semantic structures will spur new work in statistical natural language understanding and generation, like the Penn Treebank encouraged work on statistical parsing. This paper gives an overview of AMR and tools associated with it.

/pdf/abstract-meaning-representation-for-sembanking-2tb177kukk.pdf

Laura Banarescu

Papers

Abstract Meaning Representation for Sembanking

Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse