L
Leland A. Carlson
Researcher at Texas A&M University
Publications - 52
Citations - 576
Leland A. Carlson is an academic researcher from Texas A&M University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Transonic & Radiative transfer. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 52 publications receiving 543 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
New thermal and trajectory model for high-altitude balloons
Leland A. Carlson,Walter J. Horn +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a new computer model for the prediction of the trajectory and thermal behavior of high altitude balloons has been developed, which permits radiative emission and absorption of the lifting gas and daytime gas temperatures above that of the balloon film.
Journal ArticleDOI
Transonic airfoil analysis and design using Cartesian coordinates
TL;DR: In this article, an inverse numerical technique for designing transonic airfoils having a prescribed pressure distribution is presented, which includes simultaneous airfoil update and utilizes a direct-inverse approach that permits a logical method for controlling trailing edge closure.
Journal ArticleDOI
Effect of electron temperature and impact ionization on Martian return AOTV flowfields
TL;DR: In this article, various electron impact ionization models in conjunction with a quasi-equilibrium electron temperature model have been investigated and applied to the stagnation region of a hypothetical 2.3 m nose radius Martian return AOTV.
Journal ArticleDOI
Determination of aerodynamic sensitivity coefficients based on the transonic small perturbation formulation
TL;DR: In this paper, the quasianalytical approach was used to compute airfoil aerodynamic sensitivity coefficients in the transonic and supersonic flight regimes for small perturbation residual expression.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Determination of aerodynamic sensitivity coefficients in the transonic and supersonic regimes
TL;DR: In this paper, a quasi-analytical approach was developed to compute airfoil aerodynamic sensitivity coefficients in the transonic and supersonic flight regimes, and the results were compared to those obtained by the direct (finite difference) approach and both methods were evaluated to determine their computational accuracies and efficiencies.