scispace - formally typeset
L

Lin Norton

Researcher at Liverpool Hope University

Publications -  49
Citations -  1754

Lin Norton is an academic researcher from Liverpool Hope University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Higher education & Action research. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 48 publications receiving 1627 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education

TL;DR: A questionnaire measuring nine different aspects of teachers' beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education was distributed to teachers at four institutions in the United Kingdom, yielding 638 complete sets of responses as discussed by the authors.
Book

Action Research in Teaching and Learning: A Practical Guide to Conducting Pedagogical Research in Universities

Lin Norton
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss why teachers want to improve their teaching and/or what their students learn and what they teach and how to improve the teaching and learning of students.
Journal ArticleDOI

‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’ Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it

TL;DR: This article conducted an in-depth interview study with 14 final year undergraduates, reflecting on their perceptions of feedback written on marked assignments, by selecting examples of what they considered to be "good" and "bad" work.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using assessment criteria as learning criteria: a case study in psychology

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the current trend of making assessment criteria more explicit in higher education may have a deleterious effect on students' learning and propose to re-conceptualize assessment criteria as learning criteria using Biggs' principle of constructive alignment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Complex skills and academic writing: a review of evidence about the types of learning required to meet core assessment criteria

TL;DR: Taylor and Francis as discussed by the authors reviewed theory and evidence about the extent to which four core criteria for student writing-critical thinking, use of language, structuring, and argument-refer to the outcomes of three types of learning: generic skills learning, a deep approach to learning, and complex learning.