The hydrogen bond is the most important of all directional intermolecular interactions. It is operative in determining molecular conformation, molecular aggregation, and the function of a vast number of chemical systems ranging from inorganic to biological. Research into hydrogen bonds experienced a stagnant period in the 1980s, but re-opened around 1990, and has been in rapid development since then. In terms of modern concepts, the hydrogen bond is understood as a very broad phenomenon, and it is accepted that there are open borders to other effects. There are dozens of different types of X-H.A hydrogen bonds that occur commonly in the condensed phases, and in addition there are innumerable less common ones. Dissociation energies span more than two orders of magnitude (about 0.2-40 kcal mol(-1)). Within this range, the nature of the interaction is not constant, but its electrostatic, covalent, and dispersion contributions vary in their relative weights. The hydrogen bond has broad transition regions that merge continuously with the covalent bond, the van der Waals interaction, the ionic interaction, and also the cation-pi interaction. All hydrogen bonds can be considered as incipient proton transfer reactions, and for strong hydrogen bonds, this reaction can be in a very advanced state. In this review, a coherent survey is given on all these matters.

The hydrogen bond in the solid state.

The C-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bond is so well-established in structural chemistry that it seems difficult now to believe that when Sutor proposed the existence of this type of hydrogen bond in the early 1960s,1,2 her suggestion was drowned in scepticism, if not outright hostility.3 It was only two decades later, with Taylor and Kennard’s paper, that the subject was properly revived.4 Shortly thereafter, an Account appeared from this laboratory describing the role of the C-H‚‚‚O interaction in crystal engineering.5 Subsequently, one felt confident enough to term these erstwhile “interactions” hydrogen bonds, in a second Account.6 A recent invitation to contribute another Account and the many recent efforts in this direction by my students and postdoctorals have led to the present paper. It is clearly no longer necessary to justify the relevance of C-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bonds, so widely invoked are they in small-molecule and biological crystallography. The presence of O-atoms in a large majority of organic molecules means that this hydrogen bond is widespread, even if not identified in many cases. However, other questions concerning these weak hydrogen bonds could be posed: (1) What is their upper distance limit? (2) Are very short, bent bonds significant? (3) Why do C-H‚‚‚O bonds sometimes disturb the strong O-H‚‚‚O and N-H‚‚‚O network? Alternatively, why do hydrogen bond donors and acceptors not always pair in descending order of strength? (4) How important is cooperativity for weak hydrogen bonds? (5) Are C-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bonds responsible for crystal packing, or are they the forced consequences of packing? (6) Are weak hydrogen bonds robust enough for supramolecular synthesis and crystal engineering? (7) Does the C-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bond have any biological significance? These difficult questions cannot be answered fully. This Account attempts to address some of them, but better answers can only follow from further work.

The C-h···o hydrogen bond: structural implications and supramolecular design.

http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu/teaching/workshop/M2M/pdfs/1999WordJMB285b.pdf

Asparagine and Glutamine: Using Hydrogen Atom Contacts in the Choice of Side-chain Amide Orientation

Ab initio calculations are used to analyze the CH···O interaction between FnH3-nCH as proton donor and H2O, CH3OH, and H2CO as acceptor. The interaction is quite weak with CH4 as donor but is enhanced by 1 kcal/mol with each F added to the donor. The CH···O interaction behaves very much like a conventional OH···O H-bond in most respects, including shifts in electron density that accompany the formation of the bond and the magnitudes of the various components of the interaction energy. The two sorts of H-bonds also gravitate toward a similar equilibrium geometry and are comparably sensitive to deformations from that structure. In a quantitative sense, while both CH···O and OH···O prefer a linear configuration, the former is somewhat more easily bent and is less sensitive to stretches from its equilibrium H-bond length. Whereas the OH bond has been shown to stretch and undergo a red shift in its vibrational frequency upon formation of a H-bond, the CH bond of the molecules studied here follows the opposite ...

Fundamental Properties of the CH···O Interaction: Is It a True Hydrogen Bond?

The first structure of an ammonia channel from the Amt/MEP/Rh protein superfamily, determined to 1.35 angstrom resolution, shows it to be a channel that spans the membrane 11 times. Two structurally similar halves span the membrane with opposite polarity. Structures with and without ammonia or methyl ammonia show a vestibule that recruits NH4+/NH3, a binding site for NH4+, and a 20 angstrom-long hydrophobic channel that lowers the NH4+ pKa to below 6 and conducts NH3. Favorable interactions for NH3 are seen within the channel and use conserved histidines. Reconstitution of AmtB into vesicles shows that AmtB conducts uncharged NH3.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/305/5690/1587.full.pdf

Linda Lee

Papers

The occurrence of C-H...O hydrogen bonds in proteins.