L
Lionel Tarassenko
Researcher at University of Oxford
Publications - 419
Citations - 19351
Lionel Tarassenko is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Artificial neural network & Vital signs. The author has an hindex of 67, co-authored 395 publications receiving 16265 citations. Previous affiliations of Lionel Tarassenko include National Institutes of Health & National Institute for Health Research.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Application of independent component analysis in removing artefacts from the electrocardiogram
TL;DR: An ICA algorithm is tested on three-channel ECG recordings taken from human subjects, mostly in the coronary care unit, and results are presented that show that ICA can detect and remove a variety of noise and artefact sources in these ECGs.
Journal ArticleDOI
A probabilistic resource allocating network for novelty detection
TL;DR: A robust method for novelty detection is developed, which aims to minimize the number of heuristically chosen thresholds in the novelty decision process by growing a gaussian mixture model to form a representation of a training set of normal system states.
Patent
Combining measurements from different sensors
TL;DR: In this paper, a model of the process generating the physiological parameter, e.g. the heart rate, is constructed and is run independently for each channel to generate predictions of the parameter.
Journal ArticleDOI
Breathing Rate Estimation From the Electrocardiogram and Photoplethysmogram: A Review
Peter Charlton,Drew A. Birrenkott,Timothy Bonnici,Marco A. F. Pimentel,Alistair E. W. Johnson,Jordi Alastruey,Lionel Tarassenko,Peter J. Watkinson,Richard Beale,David A. Clifton +9 more
TL;DR: A review of the literature on BR estimation from the ECG and PPG signals is presented, and the most pressing directions for future research are outlined, including the steps required to use BR algorithms in wearable sensors, remote video monitoring, and clinical practice.
Journal ArticleDOI
Clinical and cost effectiveness of mobile phone supported self monitoring of asthma: multicentre randomised controlled trial
Dermot Ryan,David Price,Stan Musgrave,Shweta Malhotra,Amanda J Lee,Dolapo Ayansina,Aziz Sheikh,Lionel Tarassenko,Claudia Pagliari,Hilary Pinnock +9 more
TL;DR: Mobile technology does not improve asthma control or increase self efficacy compared with paper based monitoring when both groups received clinical care to guidelines standards and the mobile technology was not cost effective.