Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques

In this tutorial review, an overview of the why, what and how of enzyme immobilisation for use in biocatalysis is presented. The importance of biocatalysis in the context of green and sustainable chemicals manufacture is discussed and the necessity for immobilisation of enzymes as a key enabling technology for practical and commercial viability is emphasised. The underlying reasons for immobilisation are the need to improve the stability and recyclability of the biocatalyst compared to the free enzyme. The lower risk of product contamination with enzyme residues and low or no allergenicity are further advantages of immobilised enzymes. Methods for immobilisation are divided into three categories: adsorption on a carrier (support), encapsulation in a carrier, and cross-linking (carrier-free). General considerations regarding immobilisation, regardless of the method used, are immobilisation yield, immobilisation efficiency, activity recovery, enzyme loading (wt% in the biocatalyst) and the physical properties, e.g. particle size and density, hydrophobicity and mechanical robustness of the immobilisate, i.e. the immobilised enzyme as a whole (enzyme + support). The choice of immobilisate is also strongly dependent on the reactor configuration used, e.g. stirred tank, fixed bed, fluidised bed, and the mode of downstream processing. Emphasis is placed on relatively recent developments, such as the use of novel supports such as mesoporous silicas, hydrogels, and smart polymers, and cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs).

/pdf/enzyme-immobilisation-in-biocatalysis-why-what-and-how-2xy4zx4fuj.pdf

Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis : Why, what and how

Immobilization is often the key to optimizing the operational performance of an enzyme in industrial processes, particularly for use in non-aqueous media. Different methods for the immobilization of enzymes are critically reviewed. The methods are divided into three main categories, viz. (i) binding to a prefabricated support (carrier), (ii) entrapment in organic or inorganic polymer matrices, and (iii) cross-linking of enzyme molecules. Emphasis is placed on relatively recent developments, such as the use of novel supports, e.g., mesoporous silicas, hydrogels, and smart polymers, novel entrapment methods and cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs).

http://largens.com/biochemlab/peroxidase2.pdf

Enzyme immobilization: The quest for optimum performance

Enzyme biocatalysis plays a very relevant role in the development of many chemical industries, e.g., energy, food or fine chemistry. To achieve this goal, enzyme immobilization is a usual pre-requisite as a solution to get reusable biocatalysts and thus decrease the price of this relatively expensive compound. However, a proper immobilization technique may permit far more than to get a reusable enzyme; it may be used to improve enzyme performance by improving some enzyme limitations: enzyme purity, stability (including the possibility of enzyme reactivation), activity, specificity, selectivity, or inhibitions. Among the diverse immobilization techniques, the use of pre-existing supports to immobilize enzymes (via covalent or physical coupling) and the immobilization without supports [enzyme crosslinked aggregates (CLEAs) or crystals (CLECs)] are the most used or promising ones. This paper intends to give the advantages and disadvantages of the different existing immobilization strategies to solve the different aforementioned enzyme limitations. Moreover, the use of nanoparticles as immobilization supports is achieving an increasing importance, as the nanoparticles versatility increases and becomes more accessible to the researchers. We will also discuss here some of the advantages and drawbacks of these non porous supports compared to conventional porous supports. Although there are no universal optimal solutions for all cases, we will try to give some advice to select the optimal strategy for each particular enzyme and process, considering the enzyme properties, nature of the process and of the substrate. In some occasions the selection will be compulsory, for example due to the nature of the substrate. In other cases the optimal biocatalyst may depend on the company requirements (e.g., volumetric activity, enzyme stability, etc).

Potential of Different Enzyme Immobilization Strategies to Improve Enzyme Performance

Application of chitin- and chitosan-based materials for enzyme immobilizations: a review

Immobilization of Alcaligenes sp. lipase as catalyst for the transesterification of vegetable oils to produce biodiesel

Homogeneous Enzyme Kinetics

Chitosan was derivatized by two methodologies to design a robust biocatalyst of immobilized Bacillus circulans β-galactosidase from a low-cost support for its further application in the synthesis of galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS). In the first one, chitosan was derivatized by cross-linking with glutaraldehyde and activated with epichlorohydrin; in the second one, cross-linking and activation were done with epichlorohydrin in a two-step process, favoring first support cross-linking and then support functionalization (C-EPI-EPI). Epoxy groups were hydrolyzed and oxidized, obtaining two supports activated with different aldehyde concentrations (100-250 μmol/g). The expressed activity and stability of the immobilized biocatalysts varied according to the derivatization methodology, showing that both the cross-linking agent and the activation degree are key parameters in the final biocatalyst performance. The best compromise between expressed activity and thermal stability was obtained using C-EPI-EPI with 200 μmol of aldehyde groups per gram of support. The immobilization conditions were optimized, obtaining a biocatalyst with 280 IU/g, immobilization yields in terms of activity and protein of 17.3 ± 0.4 and 61.5 ± 3.9%, respectively, and a high thermal stability, with a half-life of 449 times the value of the soluble enzyme. The biocatalyst was applied to the synthesis of GOS in repeated batch operation without affecting the product composition. Four successive batches were required for obtaining a cumulative specific productivity higher than the one obtained with the soluble enzyme.

Improvement of chitosan derivatization for the immobilization of bacillus circulans β-galactosidase and its further application in galacto-oligosaccharide synthesis.

Aroma is a remarkable factor of quality and consumer preference in wine, representing a distinctive feature of the product. Most aromatic compounds in varietals are in the form of glycosidic precursors, which are constituted by a volatile aglycone moiety linked to a glucose residue by an O-glycosidic bond; glucose is often linked to another sugar (arabinose, rhamnose or apiose). The use of soluble β-glycosidases for aroma liberation implies the addition of a precipitating agent to remove it from the product and precludes its reuse after one batch. An attractive option from a technological perspective that will aid in removing such constraints is the use of immobilized glycosidases. Immobilization by aggregation and crosslinking is a simple strategy producing enzyme catalysts of very high specific activity, being an attractive option to conventional immobilization to solid inert supports. The purpose of this work was the evaluation of co-immobilized β-glycosidases crosslinked aggregates produced from the commercial preparation AR2000, which contains the enzymes involved in the release of aromatic terpenes in Muscat wine (α-l-arabinofuranosidase and β-d-glucopyranosidase). To do so, experiments were conducted with co-immobilized crosslinked enzyme aggregates (combi-CLEAs), and with the soluble enzymes, using an experiment without enzyme addition as control. Stability of the enzymes at the conditions of winemaking was assessed and the volatiles composition of wine was determined by SPE-GC-MS. Stability of enzymes in combi-CLEAs was much higher than in soluble form, 80% of the initial activity remaining after 60 days in contact with the wine; at the same conditions, the soluble enzymes had lost 80% of their initial activities after 20 days. Such higher stabilities will allow prolonged use of the enzyme catalyst reducing its impact in the cost of winemaking. Wine treated with combi-CLEAs was the one exhibiting the highest concentration of total terpenes (18% higher than the control) and the highest concentrations of linalool (20% higher), nerol (20% higher) and geraniol (100% higher), which are the most important terpenes in determining Muscat typicity. Co-immobilized enzymes were highly stable at winemaking conditions, so their reutilization is possible and technologically attractive by reducing the impact of enzyme cost on winemaking cost.

Lorena Wilson

Papers

Immobilization of Alcaligenes sp. lipase as catalyst for the transesterification of vegetable oils to produce biodiesel

Homogeneous Enzyme Kinetics

Improvement of chitosan derivatization for the immobilization of bacillus circulans β-galactosidase and its further application in galacto-oligosaccharide synthesis.

Aroma Release in Wine Using Co-Immobilized Enzyme Aggregates.

Production of combi-CLEAs of glycosidases utilized for aroma enhancement in wine