Since the publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 2005, new information has emerged that requires that the guidelines be updated. The full version of the new guidelines is available on the AASLD Web site at http://www.aasld.org/practiceguidelines/ Documents/Bookmarked%20Practice%20Guidelines/ HCCUpdate2010.pdf. Here, we briefly describe only new or changed recommendations.

/pdf/aasld-practice-guideline-management-of-hepatocellular-51bocalv0r.pdf

AASLD PRACTICE GUIDELINE Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Update

https://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hep.20933

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

EASL–EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) define the use of surveillance, diagnosis, and therapeutic strategies recommended for patients with this type of cancer. This is the first European joint effort by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) to provide common guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. These guidelines update the recommendations reported by the EASL panel of experts in HCC published in 2001 [1]. Several clinical and scientific advances have occurred during the past decade and, thus, a modern version of the document is urgently needed. The purpose of this document is to assist physicians, patients, health-care providers, and health-policy makers from Europe and worldwide in the decision-making process according to evidencebased data. Users of these guidelines should be aware that the recommendations are intended to guide clinical practice in circumstances where all possible resources and therapies are available. Thus, they should adapt the recommendations to their local regulations and/or team capacities, infrastructure, and cost– benefit strategies. Finally, this document sets out some recommendations that should be instrumental in advancing the research and knowledge of this disease and ultimately contribute to improve patient care. The EASL–EORTC CPG on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma provide recommendations based on the level of evidence and the strength of the data (the classification of evidence is adapted from National Cancer Institute [2]) (Table 1A) and the strength of recommendations following previously reported systems (GRADE systems) (Table 1B).

http://www.bclc.cat/download/easl-guidelines.pdf

EASL-EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma European Association for the Study of the Liver ⇑ , European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer

https://www.journal-of-hepatology.eu/article/S0168-8278(05)00684-7/pdf

Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies.

https://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hep.29913

Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

https://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1053/jhep.2001.22172

A model to predict survival in patients with end‐stage liver disease

https://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hep.23819

M.B.A. W. Ray Kim M.D.

Papers

A model to predict survival in patients with end‐stage liver disease

Efficacy, effectiveness, and comparative effectiveness in liver disease