scispace - formally typeset
M

M. Mahdizadeh

Researcher at Hakim Sabzevari University

Publications -  46
Citations -  578

M. Mahdizadeh is an academic researcher from Hakim Sabzevari University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Estimator & Simple random sample. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 43 publications receiving 377 citations. Previous affiliations of M. Mahdizadeh include Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Using ranked set sampling with extreme ranks in estimating the population proportion.

TL;DR: It turns out that the proposed estimator is substantially more efficient than its simple random sampling and ranked set sampling analogs, as the true population proportion tends to zero/unity.
Journal ArticleDOI

A more efficient proportion estimator in ranked set sampling

TL;DR: In this article, a new estimator for the population proportion using a concomitant-based ranked set sampling (RSS) scheme was proposed, which outperformed the standard estimator in the RSS as long as the ranking quality was fairly good.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficiency of ranked set sampling in entropy estimation and goodness-of-fit testing for the inverse Gaussian law

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss entropy estimation in RSS design and aforementioned extensions and compare the results with those in SRS design in terms of bias and root mean square error (RMSE).
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficient body fat estimation using multistage pair ranked set sampling.

TL;DR: Although the suggested mean estimator in multistage pair ranked set sampling is unbiased, and under perfect rankings has variance no larger than its simple random sampling counterpart, the situation may be reversed if cost considerations are taken into account.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimating the population proportion in pair ranked set sampling with application to air quality monitoring

TL;DR: In this paper, an unbiased estimator for the population proportion in pair ranked set sampling design is proposed, and its theoretical properties are studied, showing that the estimator is more (less) efficient than its counterpart in simple random sampling (ranked set sampling).