Diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) is a serious and common complication of diabetes. Despite its relationship to an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and its association with multiple symptoms and impairments, the significance of DAN has not been fully appreciated. The reported prevalence of DAN varies widely depending on the cohort studied and the methods of assessment. In randomly selected cohorts of asymptomatic individuals with diabetes, 20% had abnormal cardiovascular autonomic function. DAN frequently coexists with other peripheral neuropathies and other diabetic complications, but DAN may be isolated, frequently preceding the detection of other complications. Major clinical manifestations of DAN include resting tachycardia, exercise intolerance, orthostatic hypotension, constipation, gastro- paresis, erectile dysfunction, sudomotor dysfunction, impaired neurovascular function, "brit- tle diabetes," and hypoglycemic autonomic failure. DAN may affect many organ systems throughout the body (e.g., gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary, and cardiovascular). GI distur- bances (e.g., esophageal enteropathy, gastroparesis, constipation, diarrhea, and fecal inconti- nence) are common, and any section of the GI tract may be affected. Gastroparesis should be suspected in individuals with erratic glucose control. Upper-GI symptoms should lead to con- sideration of all possible causes, including autonomic dysfunction. Whereas a radiographic gastric emptying study can definitively establish the diagnosis of gastroparesis, a reasonable approach is to exclude autonomic dysfunction and other known causes of these upper-GI symptoms. Constipation is the most common lower-GI symptom but can alternate with episodes of diarrhea. Diagnostic approaches should rule out autonomic dysfunction and the well-known causes such as neoplasia. Occasionally, anorectal manometry and other specialized tests typically performed by the gastroenterologist may be helpful. DAN is also associated with genitourinary tract disturbances including bladder and/or sexual dysfunction. Evaluation of bladder dysfunc- tion should be performed for individuals with diabetes who have recurrent urinary tract infec- tions, pyelonephritis, incontinence, or a palpable bladder. Specialized assessment of bladder dysfunction will typically be performed by a urologist. In men, DAN may cause loss of penile erection and/or retrograde ejaculation. A complete workup for erectile dysfunction in men should include history (medical and sexual); psychological evaluation; hormone levels; mea- surement of nocturnal penile tumescence; tests to assess penile, pelvic, and spinal nerve func- tion; cardiovascular autonomic function tests; and measurement of penile and brachial blood pressure. Neurovascular dysfunction resulting from DAN contributes to a wide spectrum of clinical disorders including erectile dysfunction, loss of skin integrity, and abnormal vascular reflexes. Disruption of microvascular skin blood flow and sudomotor function may be among the earliest manifestations of DAN and lead to dry skin, loss of sweating, and the development of fissures and cracks that allow microorganisms to enter. These changes ultimately contribute to the development of ulcers, gangrene, and limb loss. Various aspects of neurovascular function can be evaluated with specialized tests, but generally these have not been well standardized and have limited clinical utility. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is the most studied and clinically important form of DAN. Meta-analyses of published data demonstrate that reduced cardiovascular autonomic function as measured by heart rate variability (HRV) is strongly (i.e., relative risk is doubled) associated with an in- creased risk of silent myocardial ischemia and mortality. The determination of the presence of CAN is usually based on a battery of auto- nomic function tests rather than just on one test. Proceedings from a consensus conference in 1992 recommended that three tests (R-R variation, Valsalva maneuver, and postural blood pressure testing) be used for longitudi- nal testing of the cardiovascular autonomic system. Other forms of autonomic neuropathy can be evaluated with specialized tests, but these are less standardized and less available than commonly used tests of cardiovascular autonomic function, which quantify loss of HRV. Interpretability of serial HRV testing re- quires accurate, precise, and reproducible procedures that use established physiological maneuvers. The battery of three recom- mended tests for assessing CAN is readily per- formed in the average clinic, hospital, or diagnostic center with the use of available technology. Measurement of HRV at the time of diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and within 5 years after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (unless an individual has symptoms suggestive of au- tonomic dysfunction earlier) serves to estab- lish a baseline, with which 1-year interval tests can be compared. Regular HRV testing pro- vides early detection and thereby promotes timely diagnostic and therapeutic interven- tions. HRV testing may also facilitate differen- tial diagnosis and the attribution of symptoms (e.g., erectile dysfunction, dyspepsia, and diz- ziness) to autonomic dysfunction. Finally, knowledge of early autonomic dysfunction can encourage patient and physician to im- prove metabolic control and to use therapies such as ACE inhibitors and -blockers, proven to be effective for patients with CAN. Diabetes Care 26:1553-1579, 2003

/pdf/diabetic-autonomic-neuropathy-4kabtayo3d.pdf

Diabetic Autonomic Neuropathy

OBJECTIVE To review the evidence about the impact of hypoglycemia on patients with diabetes that has become available since the past reviews of this subject by the American Diabetes Association and The Endocrine Society and to provide guidance about how this new information should be incorporated into clinical practice. PARTICIPANTS Five members of the American Diabetes Association and five members of The Endocrine Society with expertise in different aspects of hypoglycemia were invited by the Chair, who is a member of both, to participate in a planning conference call and a 2-day meeting that was also attended by staff from both organizations. Subsequent communications took place via e-mail and phone calls. The writing group consisted of those invitees who participated in the writing of the manuscript. The workgroup meeting was supported by educational grants to the American Diabetes Association from Lilly USA, LLC and Novo Nordisk and sponsorship to the American Diabetes Association from Sanofi. The sponsors had no input into the development of or content of the report. EVIDENCE The writing group considered data from recent clinical trials and other studies to update the prior workgroup report. Unpublished data were not used. Expert opinion was used to develop some conclusions. CONSENSUS PROCESS Consensus was achieved by group discussion during conference calls and face-to-face meetings, as well as by iterative revisions of the written document. The document was reviewed and approved by the American Diabetes Association’s Professional Practice Committee in October 2012 and approved by the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors in November 2012 and was reviewed and approved by The Endocrine Society’s Clinical Affairs Core Committee in October 2012 and by Council in November 2012. CONCLUSIONS The workgroup reconfirmed the previous definitions of hypoglycemia in diabetes, reviewed the implications of hypoglycemia on both short- and long-term outcomes, considered the implications of hypoglycemia on treatment outcomes, presented strategies to prevent hypoglycemia, and identified knowledge gaps that should be addressed by future research. In addition, tools for patients to report hypoglycemia at each visit and for clinicians to document counseling are provided.

/pdf/hypoglycemia-and-diabetes-a-report-of-a-workgroup-of-the-2q0o0ydwc8.pdf

Hypoglycemia and Diabetes: A Report of a Workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and The Endocrine Society

Iatrogenic hypoglycemia causes recurrent morbidity in most people with type 1 diabetes and many with type 2 diabetes, and it is sometimes fatal. The barrier of hypoglycemia generally precludes maintenance of euglycemia over a lifetime of diabetes and thus precludes full realization of euglycemia’s long-term benefits. While the clinical presentation is often characteristic, particularly for the experienced individual with diabetes, the neurogenic and neuroglycopenic symptoms of hypoglycemia are nonspecific and relatively insensitive; therefore, many episodes are not recognized. Hypoglycemia can result from exogenous or endogenous insulin excess alone. However, iatrogenic hypoglycemia is typically the result of the interplay of absolute or relative insulin excess and compromised glucose counterregulation in type 1 and advanced type 2 diabetes. Decrements in insulin, increments in glucagon, and, absent the latter, increments in epinephrine stand high in the hierarchy of redundant glucose counterregulatory factors that normally prevent or rapidly correct hypoglycemia. In insulin-deficient diabetes (exogenous) insulin levels do not decrease as glucose levels fall, and the combination of deficient glucagon and epinephrine responses causes defective glucose counterregulation. Reduced sympathoadrenal responses cause hypoglycemia unawareness. The concept of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in diabetes posits that recent antecedent hypoglycemia causes both defective glucose counterregulation and hypoglycemia unawareness. By shifting glycemic thresholds for the sympathoadrenal (including epinephrine) and the resulting neurogenic responses to lower plasma glucose concentrations, antecedent hypoglycemia leads to a vicious cycle of recurrent hypoglycemia and further impairment of glucose counterregulation. Thus, short-term avoidance of hypoglycemia reverses hypoglycemia unawareness in most affected patients. The clinical approach to minimizing hypoglycemia while improving glycemic control includes 1 ) addressing the issue, 2 ) applying the principles of aggressive glycemic therapy, including flexible and individualized drug regimens, and 3 ) considering the risk factors for iatrogenic hypoglycemia. The latter include factors that result in absolute or relative insulin excess: drug dose, timing, and type; patterns of food ingestion and exercise; interactions with alcohol and other drugs; and altered sensitivity to or clearance of insulin. They also include factors that are clinical surrogates of compromised glucose counterregulation: endogenous insulin deficiency; history of severe hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia unawareness, or both; and aggressive glycemic therapy per se, as evidenced by lower HbA 1c levels, lower glycemic goals, or both. In a patient with hypoglycemia unawareness (which implies recurrent hypoglycemia) a 2- to 3-week period of scrupulous avoidance of hypoglycemia is advisable. Pending the prevention and cure of diabetes or the development of methods that provide glucose-regulated insulin replacement or secretion, we need to learn to replace insulin in a much more physiological fashion, to prevent, correct, or compensate for compromised glucose counterregulation, or both if we are to achieve near-euglycemia safely in most people with diabetes.

https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/diacare/26/6/1902.full.pdf

Hypoglycemia in Diabetes

Objective: The aim was to provide guidelines for evaluation, treatment, and genetic testing for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). Participants: The group, which comprised 10 experts, including physicians, surgeons, and geneticists from international centers, received no corporate funding or remuneration. Process: Guidelines were developed by reviews of peer-reviewed publications; a draft was prepared, reviewed, and rigorously revised at several stages; and agreed-upon revisions were incorporated. Conclusions: MEN1 is an autosomal dominant disorder that is due to mutations in the tumor suppressor gene MEN1, which encodes a 610-amino acid protein, menin. Thus, the finding of MEN1 in a patient has important implications for family members because first-degree relatives have a 50% risk of developing the disease and can often be identified by MEN1 mutational analysis. MEN1 is characterized by the occurrence of parathyroid, pancreatic islet, and anterior pituitary tumors. Some patients may also develo...

/pdf/clinical-practice-guidelines-for-multiple-endocrine-iebfm32j0y.pdf

Clinical practice guidelines for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)

Objective: The aim is to provide guidelines for the evaluation and management of adults with hypoglycemic disorders, including those with diabetes mellitus. Evidence: Using the recommendations of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, the quality of evidence is graded very low (⊕○○○), low (⊕⊕○○), moderate (⊕⊕⊕○), or high (⊕⊕⊕⊕). Conclusions: We recommend evaluation and management of hypoglycemia only in patients in whom Whipple’s triad—symptoms, signs, or both consistent with hypoglycemia, a low plasma glucose concentration, and resolution of those symptoms or signs after the plasma glucose concentration is raised—is documented. In patients with hypoglycemia without diabetes mellitus, we recommend the following strategy. First, pursue clinical clues to potential hypoglycemic etiologies—drugs, critical illnesses, hormone deficiencies, nonislet cell tumors. In the absence of these causes, the differential diagnosis narrows to accidental, surreptitious, or even...

Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

The safety, reproducibility, and reliability of an insulin infusion test for assessment of adequate glucose counterregulation were evaluated in 18 patients with type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. When the test (a 60-min, 30-mU/m 2 /min insulin infusion) was administered on three separate occasions at 3–4-wk intervals, coefficients of variation for plasma glucose and counterregulatory hormone (glucagon, epinephrine, cortisol, and growth hormone) responses averaged less than 8%. No patient experienced symptoms requiring discontinuation of the test and plasma glucose concentrations increased spontaneously after stopping the insulin infusion. Using objective criteria based on plasma glucose nadirs or postnadir rates of plasma glucose recovery, no patient judged to have adequate glucose counterregulation by the test (post-nadir rates of plasma glucose recovery or plasma glucose nadir above 0.4 mg/dl/min and 45 mg/dl) developed severe hypoglycemia (plasma glucose

A Reliable and Reproducible Test for Adequate Glucose Counterregulation in Type I Diabetes Mellitus

People with type 2 diabetes show an excess morbidity, mortality and disability compared with non-diabetic people; the excess mortality in western countries is mainly due to a higher incidence of macrovascular accidents. In the London cohort of the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetics (CVD), myocardial infarction, other ischemic heart diseases and other cardiac diseases accounted for 45.6%, 8.8% and 4.3% of deaths respectively and all cardiovascular diseases represented the 58% of causes of death [1]. The Multifactorial Primary Prevention Trial has confirmed that, mortality for all cardiovascular disease was significantly higher in people with diabetes than in non diabetic individuals (30.4 versus 8.3 deaths per 1000 observation-years respectively, in middle-aged Swedish men) [2].

M. Massi Benedetti

Papers

A Reliable and Reproducible Test for Adequate Glucose Counterregulation in Type I Diabetes Mellitus

Microalbuminuria and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetes