Large earthquakes initiate chains of surface processes that last much longer than the brief moments of strong shaking. Most moderate‐ and large‐magnitude earthquakes trigger landslides, ranging from small failures in the soil cover to massive, devastating rock avalanches. Some landslides dam rivers and impound lakes, which can collapse days to centuries later, and flood mountain valleys for hundreds of kilometers downstream. Landslide deposits on slopes can remobilize during heavy rainfall and evolve into debris flows. Cracks and fractures can form and widen on mountain crests and flanks, promoting increased frequency of landslides that lasts for decades. More gradual impacts involve the flushing of excess debris downstream by rivers, which can generate bank erosion and floodplain accretion as well as channel avulsions that affect flooding frequency, settlements, ecosystems, and infrastructure. Ultimately, earthquake sequences and their geomorphic consequences alter mountain landscapes over both human and geologic time scales. Two recent events have attracted intense research into earthquake‐induced landslides and their consequences: the magnitude M 7.6 Chi‐Chi, Taiwan earthquake of 1999, and the M 7.9 Wenchuan, China earthquake of 2008. Using data and insights from these and several other earthquakes, we analyze how such events initiate processes that change mountain landscapes, highlight research gaps, and suggest pathways toward a more complete understanding of the seismic effects on the Earth's surface.

Earthquake-Induced Chains of Geologic Hazards: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Impacts

Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster

Landslides are natural phenomena that can cause great loss of life and damage to property. A landslide susceptibility map is a useful tool to help with land management in landslide-prone areas. A support vector machine (SVM) is a machine learning algorithm that uses a small number of samples for prediction and has been widely used in recent years. This paper presents a review of landslide susceptibility mapping using SVM. It presents the basic concept of SVM and its application in landslide susceptibility assessment and mapping. Then it compares the SVM method with four other methods (analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and random forests) used in landslide susceptibility mapping. The application of SVM in landslide susceptibility assessment and mapping is discussed and suggestions for future research are presented. Compared with some of the methods commonly used in landslide susceptibility assessment and mapping, SVM has its strengths and weaknesses owing to its unique theoretical basis. The combination of SVM and other techniques may yield better performance in landslide susceptibility assessment and mapping. A high-quality informative database is essential and classification of landslide types prior to landslide susceptibility assessment is important to help improve model performance.

Review on landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machines

Coupling machine learning algorithms with spatial analytical techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling is a worth considering issue. So, the current research intend to present the first comprehensive comparison among the performances of ten advanced machine learning techniques (MLTs) including artificial neural networks (ANNs), boosted regression tree (BRT), classification and regression trees (CART), generalized linear model (GLM), generalized additive model (GAM), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), naive Bayes (NB), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), random forest (RF), and support vector machines (SVM) for modeling landslide susceptibility and evaluating the importance of variables in GIS and R open source software. This study was carried out in the Ghaemshahr Region, Iran. The performance of MLTs has been evaluated using the area under ROC curve (AUC-ROC) approach. The results showed that AUC values for ten MLTs vary from 62.4 to 83.7%. It has been found that the RF (AUC = 83.7%) and BRT (AUC = 80.7%) have the best performances comparison to other MLTs.

Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: Which algorithm, which precision?

Comparison of Logistic Regression and Random Forests techniques for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in Giampilieri (NE Sicily, Italy)

This paper presents recommended methodologies for the quantitative analysis of landslide hazard, vulnerability and risk at different spatial scales (site-specific, local, regional and national), as well as for the verification and validation of the results. The methodologies described focus on the evaluation of the probabilities of occurrence of different landslide types with certain characteristics. Methods used to determine the spatial distribution of landslide intensity, the characterisation of the elements at risk, the assessment of the potential degree of damage and the quantification of the vulnerability of the elements at risk, and those used to perform the quantitative risk analysis are also described. The paper is intended for use by scientists and practising engineers, geologists and other landslide experts.

/pdf/recommendations-for-the-quantitative-analysis-of-landslide-1culjw5db2.pdf

M. van den Eeckhaut

Papers

Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk