▪ Abstract DNA topoisomerases solve the topological problems associated with DNA replication, transcription, recombination, and chromatin remodeling by introducing temporary single- or double-strand breaks in the DNA. In addition, these enzymes fine-tune the steady-state level of DNA supercoiling both to facilitate protein interactions with the DNA and to prevent excessive supercoiling that is deleterious. In recent years, the crystal structures of a number of topoisomerase fragments, representing nearly all the known classes of enzymes, have been solved. These structures provide remarkable insights into the mechanisms of these enzymes and complement previous conclusions based on biochemical analyses. Surprisingly, despite little or no sequence homology, both type IA and type IIA topoisomerases from prokaryotes and the type IIA enzymes from eukaryotes share structural folds that appear to reflect functional motifs within critical regions of the enzymes. The type IB enzymes are structurally distinct from a...

DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism.

DNA topoisomerases are the magicians of the DNA world — by allowing DNA strands or double helices to pass through each other, they can solve all of the topological problems of DNA in replication, transcription and other cellular transactions. Extensive biochemical and structural studies over the past three decades have provided molecular models of how the various subfamilies of DNA topoisomerase manipulate DNA. In this review, the cellular roles of these enzymes are examined from a molecular point of view.

/pdf/cellular-roles-of-dna-topoisomerases-a-molecular-perspective-472dbio7sm.pdf

Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective.

A small RNA, RyhB, was found as part of a genomewide search for novel small RNAs in Escherichia coli. The RyhB 90-nt RNA down-regulates a set of iron-storage and iron-using proteins when iron is limiting; it is itself negatively regulated by the ferric uptake repressor protein, Fur (Ferric uptake regulator). RyhB RNA levels are inversely correlated with mRNA levels for the sdhCDAB operon, encoding succinate dehydrogenase, as well as five other genes previously shown to be positively regulated by Fur by an unknown mechanism. These include two other genes encoding enzymes in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, acnA and fumA, two ferritin genes, ftnA and bfr, and a gene for superoxide dismutase, sodB. Fur positive regulation of all these genes is fully reversed in an ryhB mutant. Our results explain the previously observed inability of fur mutants to grow on succinate. RyhB requires the RNA-binding protein, Hfq, for activity. Sequences within RyhB are complementary to regions within each of the target genes, suggesting that RyhB acts as an antisense RNA. In sdhCDAB, the complementary region is at the end of the first gene of the sdhCDAB operon; full-length sdhCDAB message disappears and a truncated message, equivalent in size to the region upstream of the complementarity, is detected when RyhB is expressed. RyhB provides a mechanism for the cell to down-regulate iron-storage proteins and nonessential ironcontaining proteins when iron is limiting, thus modulating intracellular iron usage to supplement mechanisms for iron uptake directly regulated by Fur.

https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/99/7/4620.full.pdf

A small RNA regulates the expression of genes involved in iron metabolism in Escherichia coli.

https://www.cell.com/molecular-cell/pdf/S1097-2765(12)00305-X.pdf

R Loops: From Transcription Byproducts to Threats to Genome Stability

Genomic instability in the form of mutations and chromosome rearrangements is usually associated with pathological disorders, and yet it is also crucial for evolution. Two types of elements have a key role in instability leading to rearrangements: those that act in trans to prevent instability--among them are replication, repair and S-phase checkpoint factors--and those that act in cis--chromosomal hotspots of instability such as fragile sites and highly transcribed DNA sequences. Taking these elements as a guide, we review the causes and consequences of instability with the aim of providing a mechanistic perspective on the origin of genomic instability.

Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences

E. coli type 1A topoisomerases (topos), topo I (topA) and topo III (topB) have both relaxation and decatenation activities. B. subtilis and E. coli topA topB null cells can survive owing to DNA amplifications allowing overproduction of topo IV, the main cellular decatenase that can also relax supercoiling. We show that overproducing human topo IB, a relaxase but not a decatenase, can substitute for topo IV in allowing E. coli topA null but not topA topB null cells to survive. Deleting topB exacerbates phenotypes of topA null mutants including hypernegative supercoiling, R-loop formation, and RNase HI-sensitive replication, phenotypes that are not corrected by topo IV overproduction. These phenotypes lead to Ter DNA amplification causing a chromosome segregation defect that is corrected by topo IV overproduction. Furthermore, topA topB null mutants not overproducing topo IV acquire uvrB or uvrC mutations, revealing a nucleotide excision repair (NER)-dependent problem with replication fork progression. Thus, type IA topos maintain the stability of the genome by providing essential relaxase and decatenase activities to prevent and solve topological stress related to R-loops and NER. Moreover, excess R-loop formation is well tolerated in cells that have enough topoisomerase activity to support the subsequent replication-related topological stress.

/pdf/bacterial-type-1a-topoisomerases-maintain-the-stability-of-k1xpfle57x.pdf

Bacterial type 1A topoisomerases maintain the stability of the genome by preventing and dealing with R-loop-and nucleotide excision repair-dependent topological stress

R-Loop Detection in Bacteria.

The prototype enzymes of the ubiquitous type IA topoisomerases (topos) family are Escherichia coli topo I (topA) and topo III (topB). Topo I shows preference for relaxation of negative supercoiling and topo III for decatenation. However, as they could act as backups for each other or even share functions, strains lacking both enzymes must be used to reveal the roles of type IA enzymes in genome maintenance. Recently, marker frequency analysis (MFA) of genomic DNA from topA topB null mutants revealed a major RNase HI-sensitive DNA peak bordered by Ter/Tus barriers, sites of replication fork fusion and termination in the chromosome terminus region (Ter). Here, flow cytometry for R-loop-dependent replication (RLDR), MFA, R-loop detection with S9.6 antibodies, and microscopy were used to further characterize the mechanism and consequences of over-replication in Ter. It is shown that the Ter peak is not due to the presence of a strong origin for RLDR in Ter region; instead RLDR, which is partly inhibited by the backtracking-resistant rpoB*35 mutation, appears to contribute indirectly to Ter over-replication. The data suggest that RLDR from multiple sites on the chromosome increases the number of replication forks trapped at Ter/Tus barriers which leads to RecA-dependent DNA amplification in Ter and to a chromosome segregation defect. Overproducing topo IV, the main cellular decatenase, does not inhibit RLDR or Ter over-replication but corrects the chromosome segregation defect. Furthermore, our data suggest that the inhibition of RLDR by topo I does not require its C-terminal-mediated interaction with RNA polymerase. Overall, our data reveal a pathway of genomic instability triggered by R-loops and its regulation by various topos activities at different steps.

/pdf/characterization-of-a-pathway-of-genomic-instability-induced-2gv49qub.pdf

Marc Drolet

Papers

Bacterial type 1A topoisomerases maintain the stability of the genome by preventing and dealing with R-loop-and nucleotide excision repair-dependent topological stress

R-Loop Detection in Bacteria.

Characterization of a pathway of genomic instability induced by R-loops and its regulation by topoisomerases in E. coli