scispace - formally typeset
M

Maria-Aikaterini Nikolinakou

Researcher at University of Texas at Austin

Publications -  17
Citations -  298

Maria-Aikaterini Nikolinakou is an academic researcher from University of Texas at Austin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pore water pressure & Geology. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 14 publications receiving 262 citations. Previous affiliations of Maria-Aikaterini Nikolinakou include Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Geomechanical modeling of stresses adjacent to salt bodies: Part 1—Uncoupled models

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare four approaches to geomechanical modeling of stresses adjacent to salt bodies and compare stresses generated by viscoelastic stress relaxation of a salt sphere.
Journal ArticleDOI

Modeling stress evolution around a rising salt diapir

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors model the evolution of a salt diapir during sedimentation and study how deposition and salt movement affect stresses close to the diapirs, such that the maximum principal stress is perpendicular to the contact with the salt.
Journal ArticleDOI

Geomechanical modeling of stresses adjacent to salt bodies: Part 2—Poroelastoplasticity and coupled overpressures

TL;DR: In this paper, a coupled poroelastoplastic geomechanical model is used to study how stresses and pore pressures evolve in sediments bounding a spherical salt body.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prediction and interpretation of the performance of a deep excavation in Berlin sand

TL;DR: In this paper, a generalized effective stress soil model, MIT-S1, was used to simulate the performance of the support system for the 20m-deep excavation of the M1 pit adjacent to the primary station "Hauptbahnhof" in Berlin.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of evolutionary and static modeling of stresses around a salt diapir

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare an evolutionary with a static approach for modeling stress and deformation around a salt diapir; they show that the two approaches predict different stress histories and very different strains within adjacent wall rocks.