scispace - formally typeset
M

Marina Bloj

Researcher at University of Bradford

Publications -  59
Citations -  1275

Marina Bloj is an academic researcher from University of Bradford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Luminance & High-dynamic-range imaging. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 58 publications receiving 1181 citations. Previous affiliations of Marina Bloj include University of Giessen.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Perception of three-dimensional shape influences colour perception through mutual illumination

TL;DR: It is shown that colour perception is strongly influenced by three-dimensional shape perception in a novel, chromatic version of the Mach Card, demonstrating that the human visual system incorporates knowledge of mutual illumination—the physics of light reflection between surfaces—at an early stage in colour perception.
Journal ArticleDOI

Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception.

TL;DR: The extent to which MLE is the most parsimonious model to account for observer performance is discussed, and the relative utility of shape from shading and binocular disparity for depth perception is explored.
Journal ArticleDOI

The many colours of ‘the dress’

TL;DR: It is shown that the question "what colour is the dress?" has more than two answers, and there is a continuum of colour percepts across different observers.
Journal ArticleDOI

A framework for inverse tone mapping

TL;DR: A new framework that approximates a solution to the problem of inverse tone mapping, which expands a low dynamic range image (LDRI) into an HDRI and uses importance sampling of light sources to find the areas considered to be of high luminance and subsequently applies density estimation to generate an expand map.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measurements of the effect of surface slant on perceived lightness.

TL;DR: A lightness matching task that assesses lightness constancy with respect to changes in object slant is reported, and a constancy index was obtained for each observer by comparing how well the data were accounted for by both luminance matching and lightnessconstancy.