Evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections were prepared by an Expert Panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). The guidelines are intended for use by health care providers who care for adult and pediatric patients with MRSA infections. The guidelines discuss the management of a variety of clinical syndromes associated with MRSA disease, including skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), bacteremia and endocarditis, pneumonia, bone and joint infections, and central nervous system (CNS) infections. Recommendations are provided regarding vancomycin dosing and monitoring, management of infections due to MRSA strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, and vancomycin treatment failures.

/pdf/clinical-practice-guidelines-by-the-infectious-diseases-3wgg73ktjz.pdf

Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Adults and Children

This document updates and expands the initial Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Fever and Neutropenia Guideline that was published in 1997 and first updated in 2002. It is intended as a guide for the use of antimicrobial agents in managing patients with cancer who experience chemotherapy-induced fever and neutropenia. Recent advances in antimicrobial drug development and technology, clinical trial results, and extensive clinical experience have informed the approaches and recommendations herein. Because the previous iteration of this guideline in 2002, we have a developed a clearer definition of which populations of patients with cancer may benefit most from antibiotic, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis. Furthermore, categorizing neutropenic patients as being at high risk or low risk for infection according to presenting signs and symptoms, underlying cancer, type of therapy, and medical comorbidities has become essential to the treatment algorithm. Risk stratification is a recommended starting point for managing patients with fever and neutropenia. In addition, earlier detection of invasive fungal infections has led to debate regarding optimal use of empirical or preemptive antifungal therapy, although algorithms are still evolving. What has not changed is the indication for immediate empirical antibiotic therapy. It remains true that all patients who present with fever and neutropenia should be treated swiftly and broadly with antibiotics to treat both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. Finally, we note that all Panel members are from institutions in the United States or Canada; thus, these guidelines were developed in the context of North American practices. Some recommendations may not be as applicable outside of North America, in areas where differences in available antibiotics, in the predominant pathogens, and/or in health care-associated economic conditions exist. Regardless of venue, clinical vigilance and immediate treatment are the universal keys to managing neutropenic patients with fever and/or infection.

/pdf/clinical-practice-guideline-for-the-use-of-antimicrobial-1cdrjevze2.pdf

Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Antimicrobial Agents in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Walter T. Hughes, Donald Armstrong, Gerald P. Bodey, Eric J. Bow, Arthur E. Brown, Thierry Calandra, Ronald Feld, Philip A. Pizzo, Kenneth V. I. Rolston, Jerry L. Shenep, and Lowell S. Young St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, and Kuzell Institute for Arthritis, San Francisco, California; University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, and Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada; and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland

/pdf/2002-guidelines-for-the-use-of-antimicrobial-agents-in-2br60wthls.pdf

2002 Guidelines for the Use of Antimicrobial Agents in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer

This article describes the global epidemiology of tuberculosis and reviews recent estimates of tuberculosis incidence and mortality in the world. The highest prevalence of tuberculosis infection and estimated annual risk of tuberculosis infection are in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. Overall, almost 3.8 million cases of tuberculosis were reported in the world in 1990, of which 49% were in Southeast Asia. From the period 1984 through 1986 to the period 1989 through 1991, notification rates increased in all World Health Organization regions, except the American and the European regions. In 1990, there were an estimated 7.5 million cases of tuberculosis and 2.5 million deaths worldwide. The human immunodeficiency virus epidemic is causing increases in the number of tuberculosis cases, particularly in Africa, although increases are also expected in Southeast Asia. In many industrialized countries, tuberculosis has recently failed to decline, and in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, cases and deaths are increasing. Drug resistance is a serious problem, especially in the United States. If worldwide control of tuberculosis does not improve, 90 million new cases and 30 million deaths are expected in the decade 1990 through 1999. (JAMA. 1995;273:220-226)

https://jamanetwork.com/HttpHandlers/ArticlePdfHandler.ashx?journal=jama&articleId=386167&pdfFileName=jama_273_3_031.pdf

Global epidemiology of tuberculosis. Morbidity and mortality of a worldwide epidemic.

These guidelines were developed jointly by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Surgical Infection Society (SIS), and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). This work represents an update to the

/pdf/clinical-practice-guidelines-for-antimicrobial-prophylaxis-1gq1adk8ux.pdf

Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery

Nosocomial epidemic of active tuberculosis among HIV-infected patients.

Vancomycin penetration into lung tissue was evaluated in thirty patients following the administration of 1 g of vancomycin as a 1 h i.v. infusion. Mean concentrations (range) of vancomycin in lung tissue were 9.6 (6.3-12.1) mg/kg at 1h, 5.7 (4.7-7.4) mg/kg at 2 h, 4.2 (0.8-6.5) mg/kg at 3-4 h, 2.4 (1.4-4.7) mg/kg at 6 h, and 2.8 (0.9-7.8) mg/kg at 12 h after the end of infusion. Ratios of lung tissue to serum concentration ranged 0.24 to 0.41 at 1 and 12 h, respectively. One of six patients observed at 6 h, and 3 of 7 patients at 12 h did not have detectable levels of vancomycin in lung tissue. A 1 h iv infusion of a 1 g dose of vancomycin does not achieve sustained lung concentrations above the MIC for susceptible staphylococci over a dosing interval of 12 h. Therefore, a more appropriate modality of administration, such as continuous infusion, should be considered.

/pdf/penetration-of-vancomycin-into-human-lung-tissue-3dwisbekbd.pdf

Penetration of vancomycin into human lung tissue

In a meta-analysis of 10 studies, the BACTEC 960/MGIT and BACTEC 460 systems showed a sensitivity and specificity in detecting mycobacteria (1,381 strains from 14,745 clinical specimens) of 81.5 and 99.6% and 85.8 and 99.9%, respectively. Combined with solid media, the sensitivity of the two systems increased to 87.7 and 89.7%, respectively.

Meta-Analysis of BACTEC MGIT 960 and BACTEC 460 TB, with or without Solid Media, for Detection of Mycobacteria

We conducted a two-part meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of fluoroquinolones for preventing bacterial infections in granulocytopenic patients who are receiving chemotherapy for malignancies. Overall, 19 randomized studies met selection criteria and were included in this meta-analysis of 2,112 patients. Thirteen studies that compared the fluoroquinolones alone with control regimens (co-trimoxazole, oral nonabsorbable antibiotics, or placebo) and six studies that compared the fluoroquinolones plus prophylaxis for bacteremia due to gram-positive bacteria with control regimens (fluoroquinolones or oral nonabsorbable antibiotics) were included in the two meta-analyses. The results of the first meta-analysis indicate that fluoroquinolones alone are effective in preventing gram-negative bacteremia (overall odds ratio [OR], 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.16; P < .001), but not gram-positive bacteremia (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.76-1.45; P = .7), fever-related morbidity (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.56-1.04; P = .09), and infection-related mortality (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.47-1.34; P = .4). The results of the second meta-analysis indicate that a combination of fluoroquinolones plus prophylaxis for gram-positive bacteremia (penicillin, vancomycin, or macrolides) significantly reduces the occurrence of gram-positive bacteremia (OR, 0.46; CI, 0.33-0.63; P < .001) without affecting the incidence of fever-related morbidity (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.62-1.13; P = .2) and infection-related mortality (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.40-1.38; P = .3)

Marina Malena

Papers

Nosocomial epidemic of active tuberculosis among HIV-infected patients.

Penetration of vancomycin into human lung tissue

Meta-Analysis of BACTEC MGIT 960 and BACTEC 460 TB, with or without Solid Media, for Detection of Mycobacteria

Prophylaxis with Fluoroquinolones for Bacterial Infections in Neutropenic Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.