M
Mark A. Schmuckler
Researcher at University of Toronto
Publications - 86
Citations - 2998
Mark A. Schmuckler is an academic researcher from University of Toronto. The author has contributed to research in topics: Tonality & Melody. The author has an hindex of 26, co-authored 78 publications receiving 2762 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark A. Schmuckler include Binghamton University & Cornell University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
What Is Ecological Validity? A Dimensional Analysis
TL;DR: A discussion of some demands of ecological validity and the nature of these different dimensions, as well as a critical evaluation of research on the development of mobility with respect to these constraints are included.
Journal ArticleDOI
The McGurk effect in infants
TL;DR: In this paper, 5-month-old English-exposed infants were tested for the McGurk effect with two different dishabituation stimuli: audio /ba/-visual /va/ and audio /da/-visual/va/ (perceived by adults as /da/).
Journal ArticleDOI
Expectation in Music: Investigation of Melodic and Harmonic Processes
TL;DR: This paper found evidence for the psychological reality of constructs derived from the music-theoretic literature in expectancy formation, and found that melody and harmony were perceptually independent, such that they combined additively in expectation formation for a full musical context.
Journal ArticleDOI
Detection of the traversability of surfaces by crawling and walking infants.
Eleanor J. Gibson,Gary E. Riccio,Mark A. Schmuckler,Thomas A. Stoffregen,David Rosenberg,Joanne Taormina +5 more
TL;DR: Compared with the standard, the deforming surface elicited longer latency, more exploratory behavior, and more displacement in walkers, but not in crawlers, suggesting that typical mode of locomotion influences perceived traversability.
Journal ArticleDOI
Use of Central and Peripheral Optical Flow in Stance and Locomotion in Young Walkers
TL;DR: It is concluded that children show the same relative sensitivity for flow in the periphery of the dynamic structure of the optic array as has been observed in adults, but that this differentiation of different areas of optical structure is not yet fully developed when children learn to stand.