scispace - formally typeset
M

Mark C. Belk

Researcher at Brigham Young University

Publications -  132
Citations -  3067

Mark C. Belk is an academic researcher from Brigham Young University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Predation & Burying beetle. The author has an hindex of 28, co-authored 123 publications receiving 2813 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Complex interactions between native and invasive fish: the simultaneous effects of multiple negative interactions

TL;DR: Rapid growth to a size refuge could reduce the risk of predation, but the simultaneous effects of competition decreased least chub growth and prolonged the period when juveniles were vulnerable to mosquitofish predation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cost of reproduction, resource quality, and terminal investment in a burying beetle.

TL;DR: Consistent with the cost‐of‐reproduction hypothesis, females manipulated to overproduce offspring suffered a reduction in fecundity and life span when compared to controls, although all reproducing females had reduced life spans compared to nonbreeding females.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bergmann's rule in ectotherms: a test using freshwater fishes.

TL;DR: Ashton et al. as discussed by the authors used the negative slope of the reaction norm between size at maturity and rearing temperature combined with generally lower temperatures at higher latitudes would produce a cline of increasing body size with increasing latitude.

Notes and Comments Bergmann's Rule in Ectotherms: A Test Using Freshwater Fishes

TL;DR: Ray (1960) proposed that ectothermic organisms also follow Bergmann’s rule, on the basis of primarily one line of argument, and summarized field data from previous studies to add generality to his claim of ectotherms following Bergmann's rule.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk assessment in western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis): do multiple cues have additive effects?

TL;DR: The data suggest that during risky behaviors, such as predator inspection, mosquitofish rely mainly on visual cues, whereas general avoidance behavior is determined by additive responses from visual and chemical cues.