scispace - formally typeset
M

Mark Chaves

Researcher at Duke University

Publications -  73
Citations -  6279

Mark Chaves is an academic researcher from Duke University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Religious organization & Social work. The author has an hindex of 35, co-authored 71 publications receiving 5955 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark Chaves include University of Arizona & Loyola University Chicago.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Secularization as Declining Religious Authority

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose de souligner trois points : l'autorite religieuse mise en rapport avec les recents developpements en theorie sociale, l'etat actuel de la litterature relatant la secularisation, and une approche Weberienne de l'analyse sociologique de la religion.
Journal ArticleDOI

What the polls don't show: A closer look at U.S. church attendance.

TL;DR: Aux Etats-Unis, les caracterisations de la vie religieuse font reference aux donnees de sondage sur la frequentation de l'eglise.
Book

Congregations in America

Mark Chaves
TL;DR: More than 300,000 churches, synagogues, mosques, and temples in the United States have been surveyed by the National Congregations Study (NCS) as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Religious Pluralism and Religious Participation

TL;DR: This paper found that the empirical evidence does not support the claim that religious pluralism is positively associated with religious participation in any general sense, and identified potentially productive directions for future research on religious plurality, church-state relations, and religious competition.
Journal ArticleDOI

Regulation, Pluralism, and Religious Market Structure Explaining Religion's Vitality

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors extend the analysis of religious market structure by measuring directly the regulation of religious markets in 18 Western democracies and find that the relationship between subsidized religion and religious participation holds in both Protestant and Catholic countries and its explanatory power is far superior to that of religious pluralism alone.