scispace - formally typeset
M

Mark F. Testa

Researcher at University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign

Publications -  37
Citations -  2143

Mark F. Testa is an academic researcher from University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. The author has contributed to research in topics: Foster care & Kinship care. The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 37 publications receiving 2021 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark F. Testa include University of Chicago & Illinois Department of Children and Family Services.

Papers
More filters
Journal Article

Permanency Planning Options for Children in Formal Kinship Care.

TL;DR: Illinois is the site of some of the most comprehensive and sharply contested changes being made in the way states coordinate public assistance benefits with child welfare services and exercise protective authority over children in informal as well as formal kinship care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Early parenthood and coming of age in the 1990s

TL;DR: Weissbourd and Bremner as discussed by the authors reexamine the assumptions underlying conventional approaches to teenage pregnancy prevention and reassess how the growing problem of early parenthood ought to be addressed in the coming decade.
MonographDOI

Fostering Accountability: Using Evidence to Guide and Improve Child Welfare Policy

TL;DR: Fostering Accountability as mentioned in this paper is a model of child welfare decision making that holds public officials answerable for the integrity and validity of the actions they take on behalf of the children and families in their care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Subsidized guardianship: Testing an idea whose time has finally come

TL;DR: Third-year findings from the Illinois Subsidized Guardianship Waiver Demonstration are presented, providing empirical evidence of the internal and the external validity of the efficacy of subsidized guardianship as a permanency option.
Journal ArticleDOI

Conditions of risk for substitute care

TL;DR: This article found that non-custodial mothers in inner-city Chicago share a similar profile with mothers of children in formal care: They are more likely to be single, economically vulnerable, in poor health, and socially isolated than custodial mothers.