scispace - formally typeset
M

Markku Miettinen

Researcher at Armed Forces Institute of Pathology

Publications -  293
Citations -  38239

Markku Miettinen is an academic researcher from Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Sarcoma & GiST. The author has an hindex of 95, co-authored 267 publications receiving 35541 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach.

TL;DR: Key elements of the consensus are the defining role of KIT immunopositivity in diagnosis and a proposed scheme for estimating metastatic risk in these lesions, based on tumor size and mitotic count, recognizing that it is probably unwise to use the definitive term "benign" for any GIST, at least at the present time.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors--definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis.

TL;DR: Ligand-independent activation of KIT appears to be a strong candidate for molecular pathogenesis of GISTs, and it may be a target for future treatment for such tumors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Pathology and prognosis at different sites

TL;DR: Gastrointestinal (GI) stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors specific to the GI tract, generally defined as KIT (CD117)-positive tumors with a characteristic set of histologic features.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Review on Morphology, Molecular Pathology, Prognosis, and Differential Diagnosis

TL;DR: GISTs usually occur in older adults and rarely in children in the second decade and are believed to originate from interstitial cells of Cajal or related stem cells; small intestinal tumors behave more aggressively than gastric tumors with similar parameters.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up.

TL;DR: Tumor location in fundus or gastroesophageal junction, coagulative necrosis, ulceration, and mucosal invasion were unfavorable factors, whereas tumor location in antrum was favorable (P < 0.001).