scispace - formally typeset
M

Matthew J. Page

Researcher at Monash University

Publications -  165
Citations -  48068

Matthew J. Page is an academic researcher from Monash University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Systematic review & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 43, co-authored 128 publications receiving 12149 citations. Previous affiliations of Matthew J. Page include University of Bristol & Monash University, Clayton campus.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A cross-sectional analysis identified co-authorship networks and scientific collaboration on reporting guidelines for health research.

TL;DR: In this paper , a cross-sectional analysis of published articles of reporting guidelines for health research is presented, and the authors identify key actors producing reporting guidelines, most intense collaborations, and "citation classics" in the field.
Journal ArticleDOI

Splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome.

TL;DR: In this paper , the effects of splinting for people with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) were evaluated in 29 randomized clinical trials. But the results showed that splint-wearing may not improve hand function in the short-term and may not significantly improve the long-term.
Journal ArticleDOI

Design and methodological characteristics of studies using observational routinely collected health data for investigating the link between cancer and neurodegenerative diseases: protocol for a meta-research study

TL;DR: This study will evaluate observational studies (eg, cohort and case–control) conducted using routinely collected health data for investigating the associations between cancer and neurodegenerative diseases (such as Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease, Huntington's disease, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease).
Posted ContentDOI

What do Australians affected by cancer think about oncology researchers sharing research data: a cross-sectional survey.

TL;DR: For example, this article found strong support for cancer researchers sharing non-human and de-identified human research data with medical doctors (90% and 95% respectively) and non-profit researchers (both 94%).