scispace - formally typeset
M

Matthew W. Crocker

Researcher at Saarland University

Publications -  135
Citations -  3627

Matthew W. Crocker is an academic researcher from Saarland University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Sentence & Sentence processing. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 131 publications receiving 3274 citations. Previous affiliations of Matthew W. Crocker include University of Edinburgh & University of British Columbia.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: evidence from eye-movements in depicted events.

TL;DR: On-line influence of depicted events on incremental thematic role-assignment and disambiguation of local structural and role ambiguity is revealed, and a theory of on-line sentence comprehension that exploits a rich inventory of semantic categories is argued.
Journal ArticleDOI

The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: evidence from eye tracking.

TL;DR: The interaction between utterance and scene processing by monitoring eye movements in agent-action-patient events, while participants listened to related utterances suggested a preferred reliance of comprehension on depicted events over stereotypical thematic knowledge for thematic interpretation.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing

TL;DR: This neurocomputational model is the first to successfully simulate the N400 and P600 amplitude in language comprehension, and simulations with this model provide a proof of concept of the single‐stream RI account of semantically induced patterns of N400and P600 modulations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts

TL;DR: The authors investigated two frequency-based processing accounts: the serial lexical-guidance account, in which people adopt the analysis compatible with the most likely subcategorization of a verb; and the serial-likelihood account, which people adopted the analysis that they would regard as the more likely analysis, given the information available at the point of ambiguity.