Natural occurrence of mycotoxins in cereals and spices commercialized in Morocco

Studies on Aspergillus section Flavi isolated from maize in northern Italy.

Aflatoxin mycotoxins were first described in the early 1960s as important fungal toxins, which contaminate many different human foods and animal feeds. Accurate and sensitive determination of these carcinogenic compounds immediately became an important requirement to meet food safety concerns and new official legislated regulations. For these reasons, analytical methods for aflatoxins continued to develop over the decades, reflecting advances in analytical chemistry. Currently, a wide range of methods are available to analytical scientists, ranging from newly described multi-toxin liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to rapid methods based on immunological principles. These latter methods can provide quantitative outputs or a simple rapid determination of contamination level above or below a pre-determined cutoff value. The newest official methods as validated by Association of Official Analytical Chemists International or Comite Europeen de Normalisation rely on immunoaffinity column clean-up of conventional extracts, followed by high-performance liquid chromatography separation of the analogues with detection based on natural fluorescence or the fluorescence generated by various derivatisation methods. In selecting from this range of available methods, the analytical chemist must decide on the requirements of the analysis such that the method chosen is ‘fit for purpose’.

Aflatoxin analysis at the beginning of the twenty-first century.

Immunoaffinity column clean-up techniques in food analysis: A review

Development of immunosensor based on OWLS technique for determining Aflatoxin B1 and Ochratoxin A

A collaborative study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of an immunoaffinity column cleanup liquid chromatography (LC) method for determination of aflatoxin B1 in cattle feed at a possible future European regulatory limit (1 ng/g). The test portion was extracted with acetone-water (85 + 15), filtered, diluted with water, and applied to an immunoaffinity column. The column was washed with water to remove interfering compounds, and the purified aflatoxin B1 was eluted with methanol. Aflatoxin B1 was separated and determined by reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC) and detected by fluorescence after post column derivatization (PCD) involving bromination. PCD was achieved with either pyridinium hydrobromide perbromide (PBPB), used by 14 laboratories, or an electrochemical cell and addition of bromide to the mobile phase, used by 7 laboratories. Both derivatization techniques were not significantly different when compared by the t-test; the method was statistically evaluated for all laboratories together (bromination and PBPB). The cattle feed samples, both spiked and naturally contaminated with aflatoxin B1, were sent to 21 laboratories in 14 different countries (United States, Japan, and Europe). Test portions were spiked at levels of 1.2 and 3.6 ng/g for aflatoxin B1. Recoveries ranged from 74 to 157%. Based on results for spiked samples (blind pairs at 2 levels) as well as naturally contaminated samples (blind pairs at 3 levels), the relative standard deviation for repeatability (RSDr) ranged from 5.9 to 8.7%. The relative standard deviation for reproducibility (RSDR) ranged from 17.5 to 19.6%. The method showed acceptable within- and between-laboratory precision for this matrix, as evidenced by HORRAT values, at the target levels of determination for aflatoxin B1. No major differences in RSD were observed, showing that the composition of the feeds was not a factor for the samples tested and that the method was applicable for all materials used.

Immunoaffinity Column Cleanup with Liquid Chromatography Using Post-Column Bromination for Determination of Aflatoxin B1 in Cattle Feed: Collaborative Study

Matthias Reutter

Papers

Immunoaffinity Column Cleanup with Liquid Chromatography Using Post-Column Bromination for Determination of Aflatoxin B1 in Cattle Feed: Collaborative Study