scispace - formally typeset
M

Max Waltman

Researcher at Stockholm University

Publications -  19
Citations -  185

Max Waltman is an academic researcher from Stockholm University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Damages & Pornography. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 19 publications receiving 180 citations. Previous affiliations of Max Waltman include Harvard University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Sweden’s prohibition of purchase of sex: the law's reasons, impact, and potential

TL;DR: In 1999, Sweden passed a law criminalizing the purchase of sex and decriminalizing the prosti-tuted person as discussed by the authors, which was part of an omnibus bill against violence against women.
Posted Content

성구매 금지와 인신매매 척결: 스웨덴의 성매매 관련법 (Prohibiting Sex Purchasing and Ending Trafficking: The Swedish Prostitution Law)

TL;DR: The Swedish prostitution law from 1999, now followed by Norway and Iceland, criminalized the purchaser and decriminalized the prostituted person as mentioned in this paper, which is analyzed as a cogent state response under international trafficking law, particularly to the obligations set forth in the United Nation’s Trafficking Protocol from 2000.
Posted Content

Rethinking Democracy: Legal Challenges to Pornography and Sex Inequality in Canada and the United States

TL;DR: Mazur, co-editor of PRQ, sits down with Max Waltman, Catharine MacKinnon, Kathleen Mahoney, and William Hudnut to discuss legal challenges to pornography in the US and Canada, and the consequences of these challenges for democratic systems as mentioned in this paper.
Journal Article

Prohibiting Sex Purchasing and Ending Trafficking: The Swedish Prostitution Law

TL;DR: The Swedish prostitution law from 1999, now followed by Norway and Iceland, criminalized the purchaser and decriminalized the prostituted person as discussed by the authors, analyzed as a cogent state response under i...
Journal ArticleDOI

Svar till Förbud mot köp av sexuell tjänst: en utvärdering 1999-2008 (SOU 2010:49) (A Response to Prohibition Against Purchase of Sexual Service: An Evaluation 1999-2008 (SOU 2010:49))

TL;DR: In this paper, the submission suggests stronger recognitions of the civil rights of prostituted persons so that they can claim damages from tricksters for having sexually exploited them under coercive circumstances, thus violated their humanity, equality, and dignity as persons.