Machine Learning is the study of methods for programming computers to learn. Computers are applied to a wide range of tasks, and for most of these it is relatively easy for programmers to design and implement the necessary software. However, there are many tasks for which this is difficult or impossible. These can be divided into four general categories. First, there are problems for which there exist no human experts. For example, in modern automated manufacturing facilities, there is a need to predict machine failures before they occur by analyzing sensor readings. Because the machines are new, there are no human experts who can be interviewed by a programmer to provide the knowledge necessary to build a computer system. A machine learning system can study recorded data and subsequent machine failures and learn prediction rules. Second, there are problems where human experts exist, but where they are unable to explain their expertise. This is the case in many perceptual tasks, such as speech recognition, hand-writing recognition, and natural language understanding. Virtually all humans exhibit expert-level abilities on these tasks, but none of them can describe the detailed steps that they follow as they perform them. Fortunately, humans can provide machines with examples of the inputs and correct outputs for these tasks, so machine learning algorithms can learn to map the inputs to the outputs. Third, there are problems where phenomena are changing rapidly. In finance, for example, people would like to predict the future behavior of the stock market, of consumer purchases, or of exchange rates. These behaviors change frequently, so that even if a programmer could construct a good predictive computer program, it would need to be rewritten frequently. A learning program can relieve the programmer of this burden by constantly modifying and tuning a set of learned prediction rules. Fourth, there are applications that need to be customized for each computer user separately. Consider, for example, a program to filter unwanted electronic mail messages. Different users will need different filters. It is unreasonable to expect each user to program his or her own rules, and it is infeasible to provide every user with a software engineer to keep the rules up-to-date. A machine learning system can learn which mail messages the user rejects and maintain the filtering rules automatically. Machine learning addresses many of the same research questions as the fields of statistics, data mining, and psychology, but with differences of emphasis. Statistics focuses on understanding the phenomena that have generated the data, often with the goal of testing different hypotheses about those phenomena. Data mining seeks to find patterns in the data that are understandable by people. Psychological studies of human learning aspire to understand the mechanisms underlying the various learning behaviors exhibited by people (concept learning, skill acquisition, strategy change, etc.).

Machine learning

[신간의 별자리x] 우리/미술, 그리고 ‘슬픔의 박물관’

Probability Distributions.- Linear Models for Regression.- Linear Models for Classification.- Neural Networks.- Kernel Methods.- Sparse Kernel Machines.- Graphical Models.- Mixture Models and EM.- Approximate Inference.- Sampling Methods.- Continuous Latent Variables.- Sequential Data.- Combining Models.

Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning

The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An Overview

“Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks”の学習報告

We propose a novel machine learning strategy for studying neuroanatomical shape variation. Our model works with volumetric binary segmentation images, and requires no pre-processing such as the extraction of surface points or a mesh. The learned shape descriptor is invariant to affine transformations, including shifts, rotations and scaling. Thanks to the adopted autoencoder framework, inter-subject differences are automatically enhanced in the learned representation, while intra-subject variances are minimized. Our experimental results on a shape retrieval task showed that the proposed representation outperforms a state-of-the-art benchmark for brain structures extracted from MRI scans.

A Convolutional Autoencoder Approach To Learn Volumetric Shape Representations For Brain Structures

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119886

LARO: Learned acquisition and reconstruction optimization to accelerate quantitative susceptibility mapping

Resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) yields functional connectomes that can serve as cognitive fingerprints of individuals. Connectomic fingerprints have proven useful in many machine learning tasks, such as predicting subject-specific behavioral traits or task-evoked activity. In this work, we propose a surface-based convolutional neural network (BrainSurfCNN) model to predict individual task contrasts from their resting-state fingerprints. We introduce a reconstructive-contrastive loss that enforces subject-specificity of model outputs while minimizing predictive error. The proposed approach significantly improves the accuracy of predicted contrasts over a well-established baseline. Furthermore, BrainSurfCNN's prediction also surpasses test-retest benchmark in a subject identification task.

From Connectomic to Task-evoked Fingerprints: Individualized Prediction of Task Contrasts from Resting-state Functional Connectivity

A learning-based posterior distribution estimation method, Probabilistic Dipole Inversion (PDI), is proposed to solve quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) inverse problem in MRI with uncertainty estimation. In PDI, a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) is used to represent the multivariate Gaussian distribution as the approximated posterior distribution of susceptibility given the input measured field. Such CNN is firstly trained on healthy subjects via posterior density estimation, where the training dataset contains samples from the true posterior distribution. Domain adaptations are then deployed on patients' datasets with new pathologies not included in pre-training, where PDI updates the pre-trained CNN's weights in an unsupervised fashion by minimizing the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the approximate posterior distribution represented by CNN and the true posterior distribution given the likelihood distribution from a known physical model and pre-defined prior distribution. Based on our experiments, PDI provides additional uncertainty estimation compared to the conventional MAP approach, meanwhile addressing the potential issue of the pre-trained CNN when test data deviates from training.

Probabilistic Dipole Inversion for Adaptive Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Deep learning based techniques achieve state-of-the-art results in a wide range of image reconstruction tasks like compressed sensing. These methods almost always have hyperparameters, such as the weight coefficients that balance the different terms in the optimized loss function. The typical approach is to train the model for a hyperparameter setting determined with some empirical or theoretical justification. Thus, at inference time, the model can only compute reconstructions corresponding to the pre-determined hyperparameter values. In this work, we present a hypernetwork-based approach, called HyperRecon, to train reconstruction models that are agnostic to hyperparameter settings. At inference time, HyperRecon can efficiently produce diverse reconstructions, which would each correspond to different hyperparameter values. In this framework, the user is empowered to select the most useful output(s) based on their own judgement. We demonstrate our method in compressed sensing, super-resolution and denoising tasks, using two large-scale and publicly-available MRI datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/alanqrwang/hyperrecon.

/pdf/computing-multiple-image-reconstructions-with-a-single-3vle82ye.pdf

Mert R. Sabuncu

Papers

A Convolutional Autoencoder Approach To Learn Volumetric Shape Representations For Brain Structures

LARO: Learned acquisition and reconstruction optimization to accelerate quantitative susceptibility mapping

From Connectomic to Task-evoked Fingerprints: Individualized Prediction of Task Contrasts from Resting-state Functional Connectivity

Probabilistic Dipole Inversion for Adaptive Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

Computing Multiple Image Reconstructions with a Single Hypernetwork