scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael A. Marcolini

Researcher at Langley Research Center

Publications -  33
Citations -  1476

Michael A. Marcolini is an academic researcher from Langley Research Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Noise & Rotor (electric). The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 33 publications receiving 1389 citations.

Papers
More filters

Airfoil self-noise and prediction

TL;DR: In this article, a prediction method for the self-generated noise of an airfoil blade encountering smooth flow was developed for a large scale-model helicopter rotor, and the predictions compared well with experimental broadband noise measurements.
Journal ArticleDOI

Airfoil tip vortex formation noise

TL;DR: Spectral data are presented for the noise produced due to the turbulent three-dimensional vortex flow existing near the rounded tip of lifting airfoils as discussed by the authors, and the results are obtained by the comparison of sets of two-and threedimensional test data for different airfoil model sizes, angles of attack, and tunnel flow velocities Microphone cross correlation and cross-spectral methods were used to determine the radiated noise.
Journal ArticleDOI

Airfoil trailing-edge flow measurements

TL;DR: In this paper, it was found that the open tunnel flow turbulence affects early boundary-layer transition for the higher velocities and the theory still "brackets" the data allowing some assessment of boundary-laye r transition behavior.
Journal ArticleDOI

A directional array approach for the measurement of rotor noise source distributions with controlled spatial resolution

TL;DR: In this article, an out-of-flow directional microphone element array is used with a directivity pattern whose major directional lobe projects on the rotor disk to examine noise source distributions over a helicopter rotor model.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Airfoil trailing edge flow measurements and comparison with theory, incorporating open wind tunnel corrections

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare boundary layer calculations using potential flow modeling and a well documented two-dimensional finite-difference method for laminar and turbulent boundary layers for airfoils and flat plates.