M
Michael D. Dodd
Researcher at University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Publications - 88
Citations - 2860
Michael D. Dodd is an academic researcher from University of Nebraska–Lincoln. The author has contributed to research in topics: Visual search & Inhibition of return. The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 84 publications receiving 2479 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael D. Dodd include University of Toronto & University of British Columbia.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention
TL;DR: It is shown that merely looking at numbers causes a shift in covert attention to the left or right side, depending upon the number's magnitude, which implies obligatory activation of number meaning and signals a tight coupling of internal and external representations of space.
Book ChapterDOI
In Opposition to Inhibition
Journal ArticleDOI
The political left rolls with the good and the political right confronts the bad: connecting physiology and cognition to preferences.
Michael D. Dodd,Amanda Balzer,Carly M. Jacobs,Mike Gruszczynski,Kevin B. Smith,John R. Hibbing +5 more
TL;DR: Findings are consistent with recent evidence that political views are connected to physiological predispositions but are unique in incorporating findings on variation in directed attention that make it possible to understand additional aspects of the link between the physiological and the political.
Journal ArticleDOI
Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations.
TL;DR: It is found that more participant-directed tasks (in which the task establishes general goals of viewing rather than specific objects to fixate) affect not only spatial parameters but also temporal parameters (e.g., fixation duration), suggesting independent mechanisms for control of these parameters.
Journal ArticleDOI
Attentional SNARC: there's something special about numbers (let us count the ways).
TL;DR: Though the attentional SNARC effect (spatial numerical association of response codes) generalizes to other ordinal sequences, it is found that this effect is number-specific, unless participants are required to process the cue in an order-relevant fashion.