M
Michael J. Green
Researcher at Pennsylvania State University
Publications - 216
Citations - 4760
Michael J. Green is an academic researcher from Pennsylvania State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Advance care planning & Health care. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 200 publications receiving 4154 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael J. Green include MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics & Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Aid on Knowledge, Perceptions, and Intentions About Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Michael J. Green,Susan K. Peterson,Maria Wagner Baker,Gregory Harper,Lois C. Friedman,Wendy S. Rubinstein,David T. Mauger +6 more
TL;DR: It is suggested that this computer program has the potential to stand alone as an educational intervention for low-risk women but should be used as a supplement to genetic counseling for those at high risk.
Journal ArticleDOI
Graphic medicine: use of comics in medical education and patient care
TL;DR: Graphic stories, or adult themed comics, are a popular new cultural trend, but it is argued that they are also a valuable tool for medicine.
Journal ArticleDOI
Genetic Testing for Susceptibility to Adult-Onset Cancer: The Process and Content of Informed Consent
Gail Geller,Jeffrey R. Botkin,Michael J. Green,Nancy Press,Barbara B. Biesecker,Benjamin S. Wilfond,Generosa Grana,Mary B. Daly,Katherine A. Schneider,Mary Jo Ellis Kahn +9 more
TL;DR: The task force recommends that informed consent for cancer susceptibility testing be an ongoing process of education and counseling in which providers elicit participant, family, and community values and disclose their own.
Journal ArticleDOI
"Genetic exceptionalism" in medicine: clarifying the differences between genetic and nongenetic tests.
TL;DR: It is argued that genetic and nongenetic predictive tests have several common characteristics and whether these two types of tests have fundamental differences, and whether they Warrant Exceptional Treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI
Outcomes That Define Successful Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Panel Consensus
Rebecca L. Sudore,Rebecca L. Sudore,Daren K. Heyland,Hillary D. Lum,Hillary D. Lum,Judith A.C. Rietjens,Ida J. Korfage,Christine S. Ritchie,Laura C. Hanson,Diane E. Meier,Steven Z. Pantilat,Karl A. Lorenz,Karl A. Lorenz,Michelle Howard,Michael J. Green,Jessica Simon,Mariko A. Feuz,Mariko A. Feuz,John J. You +18 more
TL;DR: More research is needed to create reliable and valid measurement tools for the highest rated outcomes, particularly "care consistent with goals," as well as to evaluate the success of ACP initiatives.