M
Michael J. Kozak
Researcher at National Institutes of Health
Publications - 26
Citations - 4484
Michael J. Kozak is an academic researcher from National Institutes of Health. The author has contributed to research in topics: Anxiety & Research Domain Criteria. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 26 publications receiving 4223 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael J. Kozak include University of Wisconsin-Madison & Allegheny University of the Health Sciences.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Developing constructs for psychopathology research: research domain criteria.
Charles A. Sanislow,Daniel S. Pine,Kevin J. Quinn,Michael J. Kozak,Marjorie A. Garvey,Robert K. Heinssen,Philip S. Wang,Bruce N. Cuthbert +7 more
TL;DR: The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework is a heuristic to facilitate the incorporation of behavioral neuroscience in the study of psychopathology, and aims to identify reliable and valid psychological and biological mechanisms and their disruptions, with an eventual goal of understanding how anomalies in these mechanisms drive psychiatric symptoms.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Validation of a New Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Scale: The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory
TL;DR: The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI) as discussed by the authors is a self-report instrument developed to address the problems inherent in available instruments for determining the diagnosis and severity of OCD.
Journal ArticleDOI
The NIMH Research Domain Criteria Initiative: Background, Issues, and Pragmatics.
TL;DR: A number of theoretical and methodological issues that can arise in connection with the nature of RDoC constructs are highlighted: subjectivism and heterophenomenology, desynchrony and theoretical neutrality among units of analysis, theoretical reductionism, endophenotypes, biomarkers, neural circuits, construct "grain size," and analytic challenges.
Journal ArticleDOI
Emotional Imagery: Conceptual Structure and Pattern of Somato‐Visceral Response
TL;DR: This research examined deductions from a new theory of emotional imagery, testing the hypothesis that the conceptual content processed during imagery determines the amplitude and pattern of coincident efferent activity.