scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael Molls

Researcher at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich

Publications -  53
Citations -  1217

Michael Molls is an academic researcher from Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich. The author has contributed to research in topics: Radiation therapy & Breast cancer. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 53 publications receiving 1154 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of three different mediastinal radiotherapy techniques in female patients: Impact on heart sparing and dose to the breasts

TL;DR: Target volume coverage did not improve significantly with 4-field or IMRT techniques, however, IMRT resulted in better dose reduction to the heart than the other techniques and might result in a reduced cardiac complication risk.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prediction of short survival in patients with brain metastases based on three different scores: a role for 'triple-negative' status?

TL;DR: A model of the BSBM unfavourable group and no intent to treat systemically might form a basis for validation in other large databases, and the triple-negativity criterion was not superior for predicting poor prognosis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Outcome After Conformal Salvage Radiotherapy in Patients With Rising Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels After Radical Prostatectomy

TL;DR: Men with postoperative PSA relapse can undergo salvage treatment by prostate bed radiotherapy, but durable PSA control is maintained only in about one-third of the patients, and despite a high biochemical failure rate after SRT, prostate cancer-specific survival does not decrease rapidly.
Journal Article

The flab method of intraoperative radiotherapy

TL;DR: The flab methods for IORT is safe and easy and has been demonstrated for more than 150 cases and allows the increase in tumor dose even in regions which are not easily treated by electron IORT due to the rigid electron applicators.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation of the graded prognostic assessment index for patients with brain metastases

TL;DR: The validity of the GPA index is confirmed in a patient population that most likely is more representative of the normal clinical situation than patients included in randomized trials.