scispace - formally typeset
M

Michel-Pierre Coll

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  30
Citations -  1227

Michel-Pierre Coll is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Empathy & Pain empathy. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 27 publications receiving 901 citations. Previous affiliations of Michel-Pierre Coll include Laval University & King's College London.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis.

TL;DR: It is revealed that MI consistently recruits a large fronto-parietal network in addition to subcortical and cerebellar regions, the first quantitative cortical map of MI, and methodological issues that should be addressed in future research are highlighted.
Journal ArticleDOI

Are we really measuring empathy? Proposal for a new measurement framework.

TL;DR: It is argued for an alternative measurement framework, in which variance in empathic response is explained in terms of individual differences in the ability to identify another’s emotional state and the degree to which identification of another's state causes a corresponding state in the self.
Journal ArticleDOI

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between the heartbeat-evoked potential and interoception

TL;DR: Meta-analytic summaries indicated there were moderate to large effects of attention, arousal, and clinical status on the HEP, and a moderate association between HEP amplitude and behavioural measures of interoception.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-analysis of ERP investigations of pain empathy underlines methodological issues in ERP research

TL;DR: The results of the meta‐analysis suggest that the centro‐parietal P3 and late positive potential component are sensitive to the observation of pain in others, while the early N1 and N2 components are not reliably associated with vicarious pain observation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Knowledge of resting heart rate mediates the relationship between intelligence and the heartbeat counting task.

TL;DR: The need to account for the influence of prior knowledge and beliefs when examining individual differences in cardiac interoceptive accuracy using the HCT is underscored.