scispace - formally typeset
M

Moritz Baumgärtel

Researcher at Utrecht University

Publications -  22
Citations -  190

Moritz Baumgärtel is an academic researcher from Utrecht University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Human rights & International human rights law. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 22 publications receiving 140 citations. Previous affiliations of Moritz Baumgärtel include Université libre de Bruxelles & University of Cambridge.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Frontier cities : The rise of local authorities as an opportunity for international human rights law

TL;DR: In this article, a proactive approach to the study of local authorities that considers local authorities as a "new frontier" in international law generally and in human rights law specifically is proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pulling human rights back in? local authorities, international law and the reception of undocumented migrants

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore a recent trend that potentially holds the key to both conundrums: the invocation of international human rights law, in their defence, by local authorities.
Book

Demanding Rights: Europe's Supranational Courts and the Dilemma of Migrant Vulnerability

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an innovative multifaceted evaluation of selected judgments of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU pertaining to such complex questions as the protection of persons fleeing from indiscriminate violence, homosexual asylum seekers, the Dublin Regulation, and the externalisation of border control.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategies of divergence: Local authorities, law, and discretionary spaces in migration governance

Abstract: This article classifies and theorizes the strategies of divergence that local authorities employ when confronting the discretionary spaces offered by domestic migration law. We propose a distinction between strategies that are either within or outside the perceived boundaries of the law and those that adopt an explicit or an implicit approach to positioning, thus harnessing or downplaying the communicative potential of the law. Based thereon, we introduce a fourfold typology of strategies of divergences that include defiance, dodging, deviation, and dilution. This typology was developed and refined based on field research in local authorities in Greece, Turkey, Italy, and The Netherlands. The case material also leads us into a preliminary exploration of which types of cities and conditions may lead to the adoption of one strategy over another. As such, this article draws attention to the relevance of law within multi-level migration governance and to the meaning of legal ambiguity and discretion as shaped by law and legal interpretation. The strategies of divergence that mould discretionary spaces, in turn, either mitigate or exacerbate legal uncertainty and should be considered a significant factor to account for change in migration governance.