scispace - formally typeset
N

N. M. Leepsa

Researcher at Arizona State University

Publications -  22
Citations -  346

N. M. Leepsa is an academic researcher from Arizona State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mergers and acquisitions & Financial services. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 22 publications receiving 213 citations. Previous affiliations of N. M. Leepsa include Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur & National Institute of Technology, Rourkela.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Agency theory: Review of Theory and Evidence on Problems and Perspectives:

TL;DR: In this paper, the main ideas, perspectives, problems and issues related to the agency theory through a literature survey is explored. But, the authors have focused on the main issues and issues of the agency problem.
Journal ArticleDOI

Wealth creation through acquisitions

TL;DR: In this article, an attempt to examine post M&A performance in manufacturing companies in India has been made, where the authors considered the economic value added (EVA), a registered trademark of Stern Stewart & Co and a measure of economic profit, in evaluating the industry adjusted returns for the companies that have gone for acquisitions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does institutional ownership engagement matter for greater financial performance?: Evidence from a developing market

TL;DR: In this paper, the impact of the ownership engagement by pressure-resistant, pressure-sensitive and foreign institutions on the corporate financial performance in a developing market like India post US financial crisis was assessed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Payment Methods in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Theoretical Framework

TL;DR: In this article, a review of the prior literature on payment methods in Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As) and summarizing its effects on the performance of companies involved in M&As is presented.
Posted Content

Predicting Success of Mergers and Acquisitions in Manufacturing Sector in India: A Logistic Analysis

TL;DR: In this paper, it was estimated that the Z score below 0.02 would indicate the company was probably headed for failure, while companies with scores above 0.2 were likely to be successful.