https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(09)62004-3.pdf

Early recognition and prevention of chronic kidney disease.

Outcomes of early versus late nephrology referral in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.

Background
Early referral of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is believed to help with interventions to address risk factors to slow down the rate of progression of kidney failure to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and the need for dialysis, hospitalisation and mortality.

Objectives
We sought to evaluate the benefits (reduced hospitalisation and mortality; increased quality of life) and harms (increased hospitalisations and mortality, decreased quality of life) of early versus late referral to specialist nephrology services in CKD patients who are progressing to ESKD and RRT. In this review, referral is defined as the time period between first nephrology evaluation and initiation of dialysis; early referral is more than one to six months, whereas late referral is less than one to six months prior to starting dialysis. All-cause mortality and hospitalisation and quality of life were measured by the visual analogue scale and SF-36. SF-36 and KDQoL are validated measurement instruments for kidney diseases.

Search methods
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2012; Issue 1) which contains the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register; MEDLINE (1966 to February 2012), EMBASE (1980 to February 2012). Search terms were approved by the Trial Search Co-ordinator.

Selection criteria
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, prospective and retrospective longitudinal cohort studies were eligible for inclusion.

Data collection and analysis
Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Events relating to adverse effects were collected from the studies.

Main results
No RCTs or quasi-RCTs were identified. There were 40 longitudinal cohort studies providing data on 63,887 participants; 43,209 (68%) who were referred early and 20,678 (32%) referred late.

Comparative mortality was higher in patients referred to specialist services late versus those referred early. Risk ratios (RR) for mortality reductions in patients referred early were evident at three months (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.67; I² = 84%) and remained at five years (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.71; I² = 87%). Initial hospitalisation was 9.12 days shorter with early referral (95% CI -10.92 to -7.32 days; I² = 82%) compared to late referral. Pooled analysis showed patients referred early were more likely than late referrals to initiate RRT with peritoneal dialysis (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.64 to 1.84; I² = 92%).

Patients referred early were less likely to receive temporary vascular access (RR 0.47, 95% CL 0.45 to 0.50; I² = 97%) than those referred late. Patients referred early were more likely to receive permanent vascular access (RR 3.22, 95% CI 2.92 to 3.55; I² = 97%). Systolic blood pressure (BP) was significantly lower in early versus late referrals (MD -3.09 mm Hg, 95% CI -5.23 to -0.95; I² = 85%); diastolic BP was significantly lower in early versus late referrals (MD -1.64 mm Hg, 95% CI -2.77 to -0.51; I² = 82%). EPO use was significantly higher in those referred early (RR 2.92, 95% CI 2.42 to 3.52; I² = 0%). eGFR was higher in early referrals (MD 0.42 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI 0.28 to 0.56; I² = 95%). Diabetes prevalence was similar in patients referred early and late (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.15; I² = 87%) as was ischaemic heart disease (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.13; I² = 74%), peripheral vascular disease (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.17; I² = 90%), and congestive heart failure (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.15; I² = 92%). Inability to walk was less prevalent in early referrals (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.86). Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was similar in those referred early and late (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.14; I² = 94%) as was cerebrovascular disease (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.11; I² = 83%).

The quality of the included studies was assessed as being low to moderate based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Slight differences in the definition of early versus late referral infer some risk of bias. Generally, heterogeneity in most of the analyses was high.

Authors' conclusions
Our analysis showed reduced mortality and mortality and hospitalisation, better uptake of peritoneal dialysis and earlier placement of arteriovenous fistulae for patients with chronic kidney disease who were referred early to a nephrologist. Differences in mortality and hospitalisation data between the two groups were not explained by differences in prevalence of comorbid disease or serum phosphate. However, early referral was associated with better preparation and placement of dialysis access.

Early referral to specialist nephrology services for preventing the progression to end-stage kidney disease.

AKI associates with an increased risk for the development and progression of CKD and mortality. Processes of care after an episode of AKI are not well described. Here, we examined the likelihood of nephrology referral among survivors of AKI at risk for subsequent decline in kidney function in a US Department of Veterans Affairs database. We identified 3929 survivors of AKI hospitalized between January 2003 and December 2008 who had an estimated GFR (eGFR) <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) 30 days after peak injury. We analyzed time to referral considering improvement in kidney function (eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)), dialysis initiation, and death as competing risks over a 12-month surveillance period. Median age was 73 years (interquartile range, 62-79 years) and the prevalence of preadmission kidney dysfunction (baseline eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) was 60%. Overall mortality during the surveillance period was 22%. The cumulative incidence of nephrology referral before dying, initiating dialysis, or experiencing an improvement in kidney function was 8.5% (95% confidence interval, 7.6-9.4). Severity of AKI did not affect referral rates. These data demonstrate that a minority of at-risk survivors are referred for nephrology care after an episode of AKI. Determining how to best identify survivors of AKI who are at highest risk for complications and progression of CKD could facilitate early nephrology-based interventions.

/pdf/outpatient-nephrology-referral-rates-after-acute-kidney-3qujb044dp.pdf

Outpatient Nephrology Referral Rates after Acute Kidney Injury

Early detection of CKD may therefore have value,although criteria for a screening programme to detect thedisease must be met to balance the aggregate beneﬁts withthe risks and costs of the screening tests. General practition-ers, in particular, play a crucial role in CKD early detectionand management. All people attending their general practi-tioner should be assessed for CKD risk factors as part ofroutine primary health encounters.A number of studies

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/nep.12052

KHA‐CARI Guideline: Early chronic kidney disease: Detection, prevention and management

https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(07)00664-X/pdf

Na Lu

Papers

Outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease referred late to nephrologists: a meta-analysis.

AJM onlineLetterThe Reply