N
Natasha S. Mauthner
Researcher at University of Aberdeen
Publications - 48
Citations - 4558
Natasha S. Mauthner is an academic researcher from University of Aberdeen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Qualitative research & Reflexivity. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 48 publications receiving 4265 citations. Previous affiliations of Natasha S. Mauthner include University of Edinburgh & University of Cambridge.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore how reflexivity can be operationalized and discuss reflexivity in terms of personal, interpersonal, institutional, pragmatic, emotional, theoretical, epistemological and ontological influences on our research and data analysis processes.
Journal ArticleDOI
The ‘windows task’ as a measure of strategic deception in preschoolers and autistic subjects
TL;DR: The authors found that the ability to apply the correct strategy on the windows task was associated with success on a standard 'false belief' task and argue from this that both tasks may be difficult because they require subjects to inhibit the tendency of salient knowledge about object locations to overwrite knowledge of epistemic states.
Book ChapterDOI
Reflections on a voice-centred relational method: Analysing maternal and domestic voices.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Data are Out there, or are They? Implications for Archiving and Revisiting Qualitative Data:
TL;DR: The usefulness of archived qualitative data has been questioned where contextual information surrounding the conditions of its production is not provided as mentioned in this paper, and it has been assumed that, without this contextual information, it would be assumed that without this bac...
Journal ArticleDOI
What can be known and how? Narrated subjects and the Listening Guide
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that theoretical impasses between critical and constructed subjects can be addressed through the evolving concept of narrated subject, and they suggest that this concept needs to be further interrogated by asking what can be known about narrated subjects both inside and outside of narrative.