Authors/Task Force Members: Franz-Josef Neumann* (ESC Chairperson) (Germany), Miguel Sousa-Uva* (EACTS Chairperson) (Portugal), Anders Ahlsson (Sweden), Fernando Alfonso (Spain), Adrian P. Banning (UK), Umberto Benedetto (UK), Robert A. Byrne (Germany), Jean-Philippe Collet (France), Volkmar Falk (Germany), Stuart J. Head (The Netherlands), Peter Jüni (Canada), Adnan Kastrati (Germany), Akos Koller (Hungary), Steen D. Kristensen (Denmark), Josef Niebauer (Austria), Dimitrios J. Richter (Greece), Petar M. Seferovi c (Serbia), Dirk Sibbing (Germany), Giulio G. Stefanini (Italy), Stephan Windecker (Switzerland), Rashmi Yadav (UK), Michael O. Zembala (Poland) Document Reviewers: William Wijns (ESC Review Co-ordinator) (Ireland), David Glineur (EACTS Review Co-ordinator) (Canada), Victor Aboyans (France), Stephan Achenbach (Germany), Stefan Agewall (Norway), Felicita Andreotti (Italy), Emanuele Barbato (Italy), Andreas Baumbach (UK), James Brophy (Canada), Héctor Bueno (Spain), Patrick A. Calvert (UK), Davide Capodanno (Italy), Piroze M. Davierwala

/pdf/2014-esc-eacts-guidelines-on-myocardial-revascularization-3fr5n9jz36.pdf

2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).

Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents summarize and evaluate all available evidence with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome and the risk–benefit ratio of diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes for textbooks and their legal implications have been discussed previously. Guidelines and recommendations should help physicians to make decisions in their daily practice. However, the ultimate judgement regarding the care of an individual patient must be made by his/her responsible physician(s).

The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents can be found on the ESC website (http://www.escardio.org/knowledge/guidelines/rules).

Members of this Task Force were selected by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) to represent all physicians involved with the medical and surgical care of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is performed including assessment of the risk–benefit ratio. Estimates of expected health outcomes for society are included, where data exist. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendation of particular treatment options are weighed and graded according to predefined scales, as outlined in Tables 1 and 2 .

View this table:

Table 1 
Classes of recommendations



View this table:

Table 2 
Levels of evidence



The members of the Task Force have provided disclosure statements of all relationships that might be perceived as real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. These disclosure forms are kept on file at European Heart House, headquarters of the ESC. Any changes in conflict of interest that arose during the writing period were notified to the ESC. The Task Force report received its entire financial support from the ESC and EACTS, without any involvement of the pharmaceutical, device, or surgical industry.

ESC …

/pdf/guidelines-on-myocardial-revascularization-the-task-force-on-3qs3gmu7h5.pdf

Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

Alice K. Jacobs, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair 

Jeffrey L. Anderson, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair-Elect 

Nancy Albert, PhD, CCNS, CCRN, FAHA

Mark A. Creager, MD, FACC, FAHA

Steven M. Ettinger, MD, FACC

Robert A. Guyton, MD, FACC

Jonathan L. Halperin, MD, FACC, FAHA

Judith S. Hochman, MD, FACC, FAHA

2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions

http://www.botonimarco.it/files/linee_guida_2011_accf_aha_scai_percutaneus_coronar.pdf

2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents summarize and
evaluate all available evidence with the aim of assisting
physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an
individual patient suffering from a given condition, taking
into account the impact on outcome and the risk benefit
ratio of diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no
substitutes for textbooks and their legal implications have
been discussed previously. Guidelines and recommendations should help physicians to make decisions in their daily
practice. However, the ultimate judgement regarding the
care of an individual patient must be made by his/her
responsible physician(s).
The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC
Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents can be found
on the ESC website (http://www.escardio.org/knowledge/
guidelines/rules).
Members of this Task Force were selected by the European
Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for
Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) to represent all physicians
involved with the medical and surgical care of patients
with coronary artery disease (CAD). A critical evaluation
of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is performed
including assessment of the risk benefit ratio. Estimates
of expected health outcomes for society are included,
where data exist. The level of evidence and the strength
of recommendation of particular treatment options are
weighed and graded according to predefined scales, as
outlined in Tables 1 and 2.
The members of the Task Force have provided disclosure
statements of all relationships that might be perceived as
real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. These
disclosure forms are kept on file at European Heart House,
headquarters of the ESC. Any changes in conflict of interest
that arose during the writing period were notified to the ESC.
The Task Force report received its entire financial support
from the ESC and EACTS, without any involvement of the
pharmaceutical, device, or surgical industry.
ESC and EACTS Committees for Practice Guidelines are
responsible for the endorsement process of these joint
Guidelines. The finalized document has been approved by all
the experts involved in the Task Force, and was submitted to
outside specialists selected by both societies for review. The
document is revised, and finally approved by ESC and EACTS and subsequently published simultaneously in the European
Heart Journal and the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic
Surgery.
After publication, dissemination of the Guidelines is of
paramount importance. Pocket-sized versions and personal
digital assistant-downloadable versions are useful at the
point of care.
Some surveys have shown that the intended users are
sometimes unaware of the existence of guidelines, or simply
do not translate them into practice. Thus, implementation
programmes are needed because it has been shown that
the outcome of disease may be favourably influenced by the
thorough application of clinical recommendations.

Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

Contemporary Mortality Risk Prediction for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results from 588,398 Procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry

Ncdr Registry Participants

Papers

Contemporary Mortality Risk Prediction for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results from 588,398 Procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry