The lack of safe and efficient gene-delivery methods is a limiting obstacle to human gene therapy. Synthetic gene-delivery agents, although safer than recombinant viruses, generally do not possess the required efficacy. In recent years, a variety of effective polymers have been designed specifically for gene delivery, and much has been learned about their structure–function relationships. With the growing understanding of polymer gene-delivery mechanisms and continued efforts of creative polymer chemists, it is likely that polymer-based gene-delivery systems will become an important tool for human gene therapy.

Design and development of polymers for gene delivery

The expression of genes is regulated at many levels. Perhaps the area in which least is known is how nuclear organization influences gene expression. Studies of higher-order chromatin arrangements and their dynamic interactions with other nuclear components have been boosted by recent technical advances. The emerging view is that chromosomes are compartmentalized into discrete territories. The location of a gene within a chromosome territory seems to influence its access to the machinery responsible for specific nuclear functions, such as transcription and splicing. This view is consistent with a topological model for gene regulation.

/pdf/chromosome-territories-nuclear-architecture-and-gene-36775rhtfg.pdf

Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells.

tion of gene expression and other nuclear functions — namely the architecture of the nucleus as a whole. In particular, we describe evidence for a compartmentalized nuclear architecture in the mammalian cell nucleus based on chromosome territories (CTs) and an interchromatin compartment (IC) that contains macromolecular complexes that are required for replication, transcription, splicing and repair (summarized in FIG. 1). Other nuclear components, such as the nucleolus, nuclear lamina and pores, are not reviewed here (for reviews, see REFS 15,16), and although the focus of this review is the mammalian nucleus, the nuclear architecture of other organisms will be mentioned where appropriate. During the past two decades, various new methods have expanded the cell biologist’s ‘toolkit’ for the study of nuclear architecture and function (BOX 1). These methods have provided the basis for detailed studies of CTs, as well as for studies of the topology and dynamics of non-chromatin domains in the nucleus of fixed and, more recently, living cells. Computer simulations of CTs and nuclear architecture are also being used to make quantitative predictions that can be tested experimentally. On the basis of Despite all the celebrations associated with the sequencing of the human genome, and the genomes of other model organisms, our abilities to interpret genome sequences are quite limited. For example, we cannot understand the orchestrated activity — and the silencing — of many thousands of genes in any given cell just on the basis of DNA sequences, such as promoter and enhancer elements. How are the profound differences in gene activities established and maintained in a large number of cell types to ensure the development and functioning of a complex multicellular organism? To answer this question fully, we need to understand how genomes are organized in the nucleus, the basic principles of nuclear architecture and the changes in nuclear organization that occur during cellular differentiation. During recent years, EPIGENETIC mechanisms of gene regulation, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, have entered the centre stage of chromatin research. Modifications of DNA and nucleosomes, however, as well as boundaries and insulators, that affect gene regulation at the chromatin level are not the focus of this article. Instead, we review experimental data and models for a higher level of the regulaCHROMOSOME TERRITORIES, NUCLEAR ARCHITECTURE AND GENE REGULATION IN MAMMALIAN CELLS

Nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells

Polyethylenimine-based non-viral gene delivery systems.

The conversion of acetylcholine binding into ion conduction across the membrane is becoming more clearly understood in terms of the structure of the receptor and its transitions. A high-resolution structure of a protein that is homologous to the extracellular domain of the receptor has revealed the binding sites and subunit interfaces in great detail. Although the structures of the membrane and cytoplasmic domains are less well determined, the channel lining and the determinants of selectivity have been mapped. The location and structure of the gates, and the coupling between binding sites and gates, remain to be established.

/pdf/emerging-structure-of-the-nicotinic-acetylcholine-receptors-2ul39v0cju.pdf

Emerging structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01604987/document

Size-dependent DNA Mobility in Cytoplasm and Nucleus

The vertebrate glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is cytoplasmic without hormone and localizes to the nucleus after hormone binding. GR has two nuclear localization signals (NLS): NL1 is similar in sequence to the SV40 NLS; NL2 is poorly defined, residing in the ligand-binding domain. We found that GR displayed similar hormone-regulated compartmentalization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and required the Sxm1 nuclear import receptor for NL2-mediated import. Two metazoan homologues of Sxm1, importin 7 and importin 8, bound both NL1 and NL2, whereas importin alpha selectively bound NL1. In an in vitro nuclear import assay, both importin 7 and the importin alpha-importin beta heterodimer could import a GR NL1 fragment. Under these conditions, full-length GR localized to nuclei in the presence but not absence of an unidentified component in cell extracts. Interestingly, importin 7, importin 8, and importin alpha bound GR even in the absence of hormone; thus, hormonal control of localization is exerted at a step downstream of import receptor binding.

/pdf/importin-7-and-importin-a-importin-b-are-nuclear-import-1h69dfbx8z.pdf

Importin 7 and Importin α/Importin β Are Nuclear Import Receptors for the Glucocorticoid Receptor

http://casey.brown.edu/chemistry/research/seto/Abstracts&papers/biotinylation-Full.pdf

Neal D. Freedman

Papers

Size-dependent DNA Mobility in Cytoplasm and Nucleus

Importin 7 and Importin α/Importin β Are Nuclear Import Receptors for the Glucocorticoid Receptor

Biotinylation of Substituted Cysteines in the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Reveals Distinct Binding Modes for α-Bungarotoxin and Erabutoxin a