N
Neal L. Cohen
Researcher at New York University
Publications - 15
Citations - 289
Neal L. Cohen is an academic researcher from New York University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Active listening & Public policy. The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 15 publications receiving 288 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Case management: the current best practices and the next generation of innovation.
TL;DR: Although the use of paraprofessional and peer assisted models of case management holds promise, much more research is needed before the effectiveness of this approach can be confidently determined.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Mentally Ill Homeless: Isolation and Adaptation
TL;DR: The authors conclude that the more disaffiliated members of the homeless population, such as those served by Project HELP, need even more extensive services than the homeless who use some kind of existing sheltered care, and they suggest various kinds of services to meet their needs.
Journal ArticleDOI
Psychiatry takes to the streets: the New York City initiative for the homeless mentally ill.
TL;DR: New York City's program to remove seriously mentally ill homeless people from the streets to a public hospital is described and it is revealed that 55% of the patients either were living in a community setting or were under institutional care 2 years after initiation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Taking the Suspected Mentally Ill off the Streets to Public General Hospitals
Luis R. Marcos,Neal L. Cohen +1 more
TL;DR: A large number of psychiatrists believe that patients with a history of depression and a lack of awareness of their illness and lack of motivation to seek treatment should be treated against their will.
Journal ArticleDOI
Locus of control as a predictor of outcome in treatment of obesity
Neal L. Cohen,Murray Alpert +1 more
TL;DR: In a treatment program for obesity utilizing hypnosis, internal Rotter I-E scores correlated with measures of weight loss, but the depth of hypnotic trance did not correlate with outcome, so it was not considered an important aspect of the treatment.