scispace - formally typeset
N

Neil P. Johnson

Researcher at University of Adelaide

Publications -  135
Citations -  8469

Neil P. Johnson is an academic researcher from University of Adelaide. The author has contributed to research in topics: Endometriosis & Randomized controlled trial. The author has an hindex of 41, co-authored 122 publications receiving 7127 citations. Previous affiliations of Neil P. Johnson include University of Auckland.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

TL;DR: Among women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease, VH appears to be superior to LH and AH, as it is associated with faster return to normal activities and less febrile episodes postoperatively.
Journal Article

Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease (Review)

TL;DR: Significantly improved outcomes suggest VH should be performed in preference to AH where possible, however, for some important outcomes, the analyses were underpowered to detect important differences, or they were simply not reported in trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consensus on current management of endometriosis.

TL;DR: This is the first time that a large, global, consortium, representing 34 major stake-holding organizations from five continents, has convened to systematically evaluate the best available current evidence on the management of endometriosis, and to reach consensus.
Journal ArticleDOI

Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

TL;DR: Significantly speedier return to normal activities and other improved secondary outcomes (shorter duration of hospital stay and fewer unspecified infections or febrile episodes) suggest that vaginal hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysteretomy where possible, although it brings a higher chance of bladder or ureter injury.
Journal ArticleDOI

World Endometriosis Society consensus on the classification of endometriosis

TL;DR: An international consensus statement on the classification of endometriosis is produced through systematic appraisal of evidence and a consensus process that included representatives of national and international, medical and non-medical societies, patient organizations, and companies with an interest in endometiosis.