Nelya Koteyko

TL;DR: The authors discuss the importance and difficulties inherent in talking about climate change to different types of publics using various types of communication tools and strategies and engage with the difficult issue of the relationship between climate change communication and behavior change.

TL;DR: In this article, the theory and practice of climate change communication have been reviewed, with the focus on the part of communicators to inform the public and more dialogic strategies of public engagement, and the tension between efforts to promote consensus and certainty and approaches that attempt to engage with uncertainty more fully.

TL;DR: In this paper, the role of carbon compounds as tools of communication in different online discourses on climate change mitigation is studied, and three clusters of compounds focused on finance, lifestyle, and attitudes are identified.

TL;DR: This paper analyzed a large volume of comments published on the UK tabloid newspaper website at two different points in time before and after the East Anglia controversy, revealing how stereotypes of science and politics are appropriated in this type of discourse, how readers' constructions of climate science have changed after ‘climategate' and how climate-sceptic arguments are adopted and contested in computer-mediated peer-to-peer interaction.

TL;DR: The authors examined the rhetorical aspects of social contestation of climate change in reader comments published in the Daily Mail, subsequent to climategate, and found that denigration of climate scientists to contest hegemonic representations, delegitimization of pro-climate change individuals by disassociation from science, and outright denial: rejecting social representations.