scispace - formally typeset
N

Nichola R. Naylor

Researcher at University of London

Publications -  31
Citations -  812

Nichola R. Naylor is an academic researcher from University of London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Psychological intervention. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 22 publications receiving 470 citations. Previous affiliations of Nichola R. Naylor include Imperial College London & National Institute for Health Research.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimating the burden of antimicrobial resistance: a systematic literature review

TL;DR: This systematic review aimed to establish the alternative methodologies used in estimating AMR burden in order to appraise the current evidence base and highlight what methodological assumptions and biases can occur dependent on chosen outcome and perspective.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantifying drivers of antibiotic resistance in humans: a systematic review

TL;DR: A systematic review using a One Health approach to survey the key drivers of antibiotic resistance in humans is presented in this article, where the odds ratios of resistance were primarily reported to be between 2 and 4 for these risk factors when compared with their respective controls or baseline risk groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

The health and cost burden of antibiotic resistant and susceptible Escherichia coli bacteraemia in the English hospital setting: A national retrospective cohort study.

TL;DR: In this article, the burden of E. coli bacteraemia and associated antibiotic resistance in the secondary care setting was estimated in the UK by using a cohort of 14,042 patients who were admitted to acute hospital in-patients between 2011 and 2012.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is antimicrobial stewardship cost-effective? A narrative review of the evidence.

TL;DR: Although the evidence-base of the cost-effectiveness of AMS is increasing, it remains inadequate for investment decision-making and robust health economics research needs to be completed to enhance the generalizability and usability of cost-Effectiveness results.