Lean is a new open source theorem prover being developed at Microsoft Research and Carnegie Mellon University, with a small trusted kernel based on dependent type theory. It aims to bridge the gap between interactive and automated theorem proving, by situating automated tools and methods in a framework that supports user interaction and the construction of fully specified axiomatic proofs. Lean is an ongoing and long-term effort, but it already provides many useful components, integrated development environments, and a rich API which can be used to embed it into other systems. It is currently being used to formalize category theory, homotopy type theory, and abstract algebra. We describe the project goals, system architecture, and main features, and we discuss applications and continuing work.

/pdf/the-lean-theorem-prover-system-description-3gp7syw2ld.pdf

The Lean Theorem Prover (System Description)

Some readers know to play the game of nim well, fewer play a perfect annihilation game, and nobody knows whether there exists an opening move in chess that will guarantee a win for white. These games and many more, belong to the family of combinatorial games, by which we mean the set of all two-player perfect-information games without chance moves and with outcomes lose or win (and sometimes: dynamic tie). The motivation for ONAG may have been, and perhaps was-and I would like to think that it was-the attempt to bridge the theory gap between nim-like and chess-like games. Why is there a gap? Every combinatorial game can be described as a directed graph called game-graph, whose vertices are the game positions, and (u, v) is a directed edge if and only if there is a move from position u to position v. Denote by N the set of all positions from which the Next (first) player can force a win; by P the set of all positions from which the Previous (second) player can force a win; and by T the set of all (dynamic) Tie positions, which are positions from which no player can force a win and therefore both can avoid losing. In an acyclic game-graph there cannot be any tie positions. The N, P, T classification of any game graph R = (V, E) can be determined in 0(\V\ + \E\) steps [8]. For both nim and chess, a finite game-graph can be constructed and the N, P, T classification can be determined. So both games are solvable in principle. If we play nim with n piles, each pile containing at most k tokens, then the game-graph contains (k + \) vertices. Suppose that in (generalized) chess played on an « X « board there are k different pieces. If k is about n/2, then the game-graph of chess contains O (2") vertices. So both game-graphs have exponentially many vertices, and thus both games appear intractable in the usual sense of computational complexity [1, Chapter 10], [14, Chapter 9], namely a computation appears to be required which is asymptotically exponential. From a computational efficiency standpoint, the essential difference between nim and chess is that nim can be viewed as a disjunctive compound (sum) of independent games, namely the individual piles. A disjunctive

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/5/31266/01455274.pdf

On numbers and games

This text is a survey of derived algebraic geometry. It covers a variety of general notions and results from the subject with a view on the recent developments at the interface with deformation quantization.

/pdf/derived-algebraic-geometry-3szvx2ootz.pdf

Derived algebraic geometry

We present a model of type theory with dependent product, sum, and
identity, in cubical sets. We describe a universe and explain how
to transform an equivalence between two types into an equality. We
also explain how to model propositional truncation and the circle.
While not expressed internally in type theory, the model is expressed in a constructive metalogic. Thus it is a step towards a computational interpretation of Voevodsky's Univalence Axiom.

/pdf/a-model-of-type-theory-in-cubical-sets-3jtuq6yrfm.pdf

A model of type theory in cubical sets

We present Voevodsky's construction of a model of univalent type theory in the category of simplicial sets. 
To this end, we first give a general technique for constructing categorical models of dependent type theory, using universes to obtain coherence. We then construct a (weakly) universal Kan fibration, and use it to exhibit a model in simplicial sets. Lastly, we introduce the Univalence Axiom, in several equivalent formulations, and show that it holds in our model. 
As a corollary, we conclude that Martin-Lof type theory with one univalent universe (formulated in terms of contextual categories) is at least as consistent as ZFC with two inaccessible cardinals.

The Simplicial Model of Univalent Foundations (after Voevodsky)

Homotopy type theory is a new branch of mathematics that combines aspects of several different fields in a surprising way. It is based on a recently discovered connection between homotopy the- ory and type theory. Homotopy theory is an outgrowth of algebraic topology and homological algebra, with relationships to higher category theory; while type theory is a branch of mathematical logic and theoretical computer science. Although the connections between the two are currently the focus of intense investigation, it is increasingly clear that they are just the beginning of a subject that will take more time and more hard work to fully understand. It touches on topics as seemingly distant as the homotopy groups of spheres, the algorithms for type checking, and the definition of weak ∞-groupoids.

/pdf/homotopy-type-theory-univalent-foundations-of-mathematics-o5uvcyiu4m.pdf

P. Aczel

Papers

Homotopy Type Theory: Univalent Foundations of Mathematics