Improvement of enzyme activity, stability and selectivity via immobilization techniques

In this tutorial review, an overview of the why, what and how of enzyme immobilisation for use in biocatalysis is presented. The importance of biocatalysis in the context of green and sustainable chemicals manufacture is discussed and the necessity for immobilisation of enzymes as a key enabling technology for practical and commercial viability is emphasised. The underlying reasons for immobilisation are the need to improve the stability and recyclability of the biocatalyst compared to the free enzyme. The lower risk of product contamination with enzyme residues and low or no allergenicity are further advantages of immobilised enzymes. Methods for immobilisation are divided into three categories: adsorption on a carrier (support), encapsulation in a carrier, and cross-linking (carrier-free). General considerations regarding immobilisation, regardless of the method used, are immobilisation yield, immobilisation efficiency, activity recovery, enzyme loading (wt% in the biocatalyst) and the physical properties, e.g. particle size and density, hydrophobicity and mechanical robustness of the immobilisate, i.e. the immobilised enzyme as a whole (enzyme + support). The choice of immobilisate is also strongly dependent on the reactor configuration used, e.g. stirred tank, fixed bed, fluidised bed, and the mode of downstream processing. Emphasis is placed on relatively recent developments, such as the use of novel supports such as mesoporous silicas, hydrogels, and smart polymers, and cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs).

/pdf/enzyme-immobilisation-in-biocatalysis-why-what-and-how-2xy4zx4fuj.pdf

Enzyme immobilisation in biocatalysis : Why, what and how

Immobilization is often the key to optimizing the operational performance of an enzyme in industrial processes, particularly for use in non-aqueous media. Different methods for the immobilization of enzymes are critically reviewed. The methods are divided into three main categories, viz. (i) binding to a prefabricated support (carrier), (ii) entrapment in organic or inorganic polymer matrices, and (iii) cross-linking of enzyme molecules. Emphasis is placed on relatively recent developments, such as the use of novel supports, e.g., mesoporous silicas, hydrogels, and smart polymers, novel entrapment methods and cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs).

http://largens.com/biochemlab/peroxidase2.pdf

Enzyme immobilization: The quest for optimum performance

Roger Sheldon (1942) received a PhD in organic chemistry from the University of Leicester (UK) in 1967. This was followed by post-doctoral studies with Prof. Jay Kochi in the U.S. From 1969 to 1980 he was with Shell Research in Amsterdam and from 1980 to 1990 he was R&D Director of DSM Andeno. In 1991 he moved to his present position as Professor of organic chemistry and catalysis at the Delft University of Technology (The Netherlands). His primary research interests are in the application of catalytic methodologies—homogeneous, heterogeneous and enzymatic—in organic synthesis, particularly in relation to fine chemicals production. He developed the concepts of E factors and atom utilization for assessing the environmental impact of chemical processes.

Biocatalysis in ionic liquids

Enzyme biocatalysis plays a very relevant role in the development of many chemical industries, e.g., energy, food or fine chemistry. To achieve this goal, enzyme immobilization is a usual pre-requisite as a solution to get reusable biocatalysts and thus decrease the price of this relatively expensive compound. However, a proper immobilization technique may permit far more than to get a reusable enzyme; it may be used to improve enzyme performance by improving some enzyme limitations: enzyme purity, stability (including the possibility of enzyme reactivation), activity, specificity, selectivity, or inhibitions. Among the diverse immobilization techniques, the use of pre-existing supports to immobilize enzymes (via covalent or physical coupling) and the immobilization without supports [enzyme crosslinked aggregates (CLEAs) or crystals (CLECs)] are the most used or promising ones. This paper intends to give the advantages and disadvantages of the different existing immobilization strategies to solve the different aforementioned enzyme limitations. Moreover, the use of nanoparticles as immobilization supports is achieving an increasing importance, as the nanoparticles versatility increases and becomes more accessible to the researchers. We will also discuss here some of the advantages and drawbacks of these non porous supports compared to conventional porous supports. Although there are no universal optimal solutions for all cases, we will try to give some advice to select the optimal strategy for each particular enzyme and process, considering the enzyme properties, nature of the process and of the substrate. In some occasions the selection will be compulsory, for example due to the nature of the substrate. In other cases the optimal biocatalyst may depend on the company requirements (e.g., volumetric activity, enzyme stability, etc).

Potential of Different Enzyme Immobilization Strategies to Improve Enzyme Performance

Seven commercially available microbial lipases were immobilised as their cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs). Preparations with enhanced activity were obtained by a judicious choice of the precipitant [(NH4)2SO4, 1,2-dimethoxyethane or acetone] and by adding either a crown ether or surfactant, depending on the source of the enzyme. Thus, precipitation of the lipases from Thermomyces lanuginosus and Rhizomucor miehei with (NH4)2SO4 in the presence of SDS, followed by cross-linking with glutaraldehyde, afforded CLEAs with three and two times, respectively, the hydrolytic activity of the native enzymes. Preparations with up to ten times enhanced activity in organic medium were similarly prepared.

Cross-linked enzyme aggregates with enhanced activity: application to lipases

Candida antarctica lipase B (Novozyme 435) catalysed the enantioselective acylation of 2-amino-2-phenylacetonitrile 1 with ethyl phenylacetate affording a near enantiopure product in 47% yield. Acylation of 1 and 2-amino-4-phenylbutyronitrile with ethyl acetate yielded an unexpected partially racemised final product. The racemisation was shown to be turnover related and is ascribed to the increased acidity of the α-proton in the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate in the active site of the enzyme.

P. López-Serrano

Papers

Cross-linked enzyme aggregates with enhanced activity: application to lipases

Enantioselective acylation of α-aminonitriles catalysed by Candida antarctica lipase. An unexpected turnover-related racemisation