P
Palaniappan Vellaisamy
Researcher at Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Publications - 128
Citations - 1896
Palaniappan Vellaisamy is an academic researcher from Indian Institute of Technology Bombay. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poisson distribution & Negative binomial distribution. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 126 publications receiving 1683 citations. Previous affiliations of Palaniappan Vellaisamy include Indian Institutes of Technology & Michigan State University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
On Probabilistic Proofs of Certain Binomial Identities
TL;DR: In this paper, a simple statistical proof of a binomial identity was given by evaluating the Laplace transform of the maximum of n independent exponential random variables in two different ways, and a rigorous proof of an interesting result concerning the exponential distribution was obtained.
Posted Content
First-Exit Times of an Inverse Gaussian Process
TL;DR: In this paper, the first-exit time process of an inverse Gaussian L\'evy process is considered and the one-dimensional distribution functions of the process are obtained, which are not infinitely divisible and the tail probabilities decay exponentially.
Journal ArticleDOI
On Distributions of Certain State Dependent Fractional Point Processes
TL;DR: In this paper, the explicit expressions for the state probabilities of various state dependent fractional point processes were obtained by employing the Adomian decomposition method to solve the difference differential equations governing state probabilities.
Posted Content
On Probabilistic Proofs of Certain Binomial Identities
TL;DR: In this paper, a simple statistical proof of a binomial identity is given by evaluating the Laplace transform of the maximum of n independent exponential random variables in two different ways, and the connections between a probabilistic approach and the statistical approach are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI
Some Intrinsic Properties of the Gamma Distribution
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that independence of Sk−1 and Yk, for all 2 ≤ k ≤ n, does not imply the independence of Y1, Y2,..., Yn.