Patrick Lambrix

TL;DR: A framework for aligning and merging biomedical ontologies (SAMBO), a first step towards a general framework that can be used for comparative evaluations of alignment strategies and their combinations and compared SAMBO with two other systems.

TL;DR: The evaluation shows that the main structure of the formats is similar, however, SBML is tuned towards simulation models of molecular pathways while PSI MI is more suitable for representing details about particular interactions and experiments and BioPAX is the most general and expressive of the format.

TL;DR: Four tools for developing and maintaining ontologies are compared, Protégé-2000, Chimaera, DAG-Edit and OilEd; each system has its own strengths and weaknesses.

TL;DR: This paper evaluates two of the most well-known ontology merging tools with a bioinformatics perspective, Gene Ontology and Signal-Ontology.

TL;DR: Ontology matching consists of finding correspondences between semantically related entities of two ontologies OAEI campaigns aim at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases These test cases can use ontologies of different nature (from simple thesauri to expressive OWL ontologies) and use different modalities, eg, blind evaluation, open evaluation, and consensus ODEI 2013 offered 6 tracks with 8 test cases followed by 23 participants Since 2010, the campaign has been using a new evaluation modality which provides more automation to the evaluation as mentioned in this paper.