scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Paul J. Perry published in 1986"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Compared to other benzodiazepines and barbiturates, diazepam appears to be the drug of choice for treating dependent patients, and is metabolized on chronic administration to a long-acting metabolite, desmethyldiazepam, which makes the drug ideal for a tapered withdrawal schedule.
Abstract: Physical dependence to sedative/hypnotic drugs is not an uncommon clinical problem. The withdrawal syndrome is analogous to alcohol withdrawal, except the duration of the syndrome occurs over a longer period of time with the symptoms being less intense than generally encountered with alcohol. The potential for withdrawal reactions is probably greater for the shorter-acting agents than the longer-acting drugs. Potentially dependent sedative/hypnotic users require stabilization of their symptoms initially, followed by tolerance testing. If tolerant, the patients should be withdrawn using either a long-acting sedative/hypnotic (e.g., diazepam) or phenobarbital. Compared to other benzodiazepines and barbiturates, diazepam appears to be the drug of choice for treating dependent patients. Diazepam is rapidly absorbed and distributed to the brain and therefore useful for stabilization and tolerance testing. It is metabolized on chronic administration to a long-acting metabolite, desmethyldiazepam, which makes the drug ideal for a tapered withdrawal schedule.

41 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that physicians should remain alert to the fact that seizures may occur as early as 24 hours after the abrupt withdrawal of short-acting benzodiazepines.
Abstract: Seizures were observed following the withdrawal of alprazolam administered in therapeutic dose for 10 weeks. A review of available case reports suggests that seizures, like other withdrawal phenomena, are more apt to occur with short-acting benzodiazepines. To prevent their occurrence these drugs sh

30 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Two methods for predicting steady-state serum lithium level were compared prospectively in in-patients suffering from affective disorder and the latter two-point method produced significantly more accurate predictions from clinical interpretation.
Abstract: Two methods for predicting steady-state serum lithium level were compared prospectively in in-patients suffering from affective disorder. A single-point prospective administration model that required a single 24-hour serum lithium level, following a test dose produced statistically similar predictions of the observed steady-state lithium levels as did a model that required 12- and 36-hour levels. However, the latter two-point method produced significantly more accurate predictions from clinical interpretation. Although the two-point approach is preferable, the single-point method is clinically acceptable if its limitations of accuracy are taken into consideration.

21 citations