P
Paul Kutler
Researcher at Ames Research Center
Publications - 42
Citations - 1037
Paul Kutler is an academic researcher from Ames Research Center. The author has contributed to research in topics: Inviscid flow & Supersonic speed. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 42 publications receiving 1026 citations. Previous affiliations of Paul Kutler include Iowa State University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Implicit Finite-Difference Procedures for the Computation of Vortex Wakes
Joseph L. Steger,Paul Kutler +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, implicit finite-difference procedures for the primitive form of the incompressible Navier-Stokes and the compressible Euler equations are used to compute vortex wake flows.
Journal ArticleDOI
Multishocked, Three-Dimensional Supersonic Flowfields with Real Gas Effects
TL;DR: In this paper, the supersonic flowfield surrounding three-dimensional wing-body configurations of a delta wing was determined by a finite difference method using a second order noncentered algorithm between the body and the outermost shock wave.
Journal ArticleDOI
Computation of Space Shuttle Flowfields Using Noncentered Finite-Difference Schemes
TL;DR: In this article, second-and third-order finite-difference schemes are described for numerical solution of the hyperbolic equations of fluid dynamics, and the results are compared with regard to dissipative and dispersive errors and shock-capturing ability.
Journal ArticleDOI
Second- and Third-Order Noncentered Difference Schemes for Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations
TL;DR: Second-and third-order finite-difference schemes for numerical solution of the hyperbolic equations of fluid dynamics are described in this article. But their methods are uncentered in the sense that spatial derivatives are generally approximated by forward or backward difference quotients.
Journal ArticleDOI
A perspective of theoretical and applied computational fluid dynamics
TL;DR: The advantages and disadvantages of analytical methods, computational procedures, and experimentation for aerodynamic design are summarized in Fig. 1 as discussed by the authors, where the advantages of each of them are discussed.