In the mnemonic model of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the current memory of a negative event, not the event itself, determines symptoms. The model is an alternative to the current event-based etiology of PTSD represented in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev.; American Psychiatric Association, 2000). The model accounts for important and reliable findings that are often inconsistent with the current diagnostic view and that have been neglected by theoretical accounts of the disorder, including the following observations. The diagnosis needs objective information about the trauma and peritraumatic emotions but uses retrospective memory reports that can have substantial biases. Negative events and emotions that do not satisfy the current diagnostic criteria for a trauma can be followed by symptoms that would otherwise qualify for PTSD. Predisposing factors that affect the current memory have large effects on symptoms. The inability-to-recall-an-important-aspect-of-thetrauma symptom does not correlate with other symptoms. Loss or enhancement of the trauma memory affects PTSD symptoms in predictable ways. Special mechanisms that apply only to traumatic memories are not needed, increasing parsimony and the knowledge that can be applied to understanding PTSD.

/pdf/a-memory-based-model-of-posttraumatic-stress-disorder-txoxxk49qs.pdf

A memory-based model of posttraumatic stress disorder: evaluating basic assumptions underlying the PTSD diagnosis.

Saving PTSD from itself in DSM-V

Inducing and modulating intrusive emotional memories: a review of the trauma film paradigm

Background Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is the only psychiatric condition that requires a specific event to have occurred for its diagnosis.

Aims To gather evidence from the adult general population on whether life events (e.g. divorce, unemployment) generate as many symptoms of post-traumatic stress as traumatic events (e.g. accidents, abuse).

Method Data on demographic characteristics and history of stressful events were collected through a written questionnaire sent to a random sample of 2997 adults. Respondents also filled out a PTSD symptom checklist, keeping in mind their worst event. Mean PTSD scores were compared, controlling for differences between the two groups. Differences in item scores and in the distribution of the total PTSD scores were analysed.

Results Of the 1498 respondents, 832 were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. For events from the past 30 years the PTSD scores were higher after life events than after traumatic events; for earlier events the scores were the same for both types of events. These findings could not be explained by differences in demographics, history of stressful events, individual item scores, or the distribution of the total PTSD scores.

Conclusions Life events can generate at least as many PTSD symptoms as traumatic events. Our findings call for further studies on the specificity of traumatic events as a cause of PTSD.

/pdf/symptoms-of-post-traumatic-stress-disorder-after-non-4qwsy2vken.pdf

Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder after non-traumatic events: evidence from an open population study

Posttraumatic stress disorder: an empirical evaluation of core assumptions.

OBJECTIVES The aim of the present study was to describe the patient's perspective on the GP's care after violent events: which role is the GP assigned; and how is the care appreciated. Events studied were serious accidents, burglary, robbery, physical and sexual abuse, disasters and war. METHOD A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 2997 patients (> or =20 years) from the practice population of 32 GPs (67 500 patients). RESULTS The response was 50%. Forty-two per cent of the respondents had experienced one or more events. Twenty-eight per cent of the victims desired some kind of professional help; more than half of them desired that care from their GP, three-quarters actually seeking it. Most frequently sought care was sympathy, "a number of good talks", and care for physical complaints. Overall, contentment with the GP's contribution was high; patients especially appreciate sympathy and support, as well as initiative on the GP's part in commencing and pursuing care. Of those who felt no need for professional help, 88% found that they could cope with the traumatic event well enough, with or without the help of family and friends. For those who did not seek help, although they did desire it, the main reasons were that they considered their problems insufficiently medical or felt that their GP lacked the time. In the case of physical and sexual abuse, feelings of guilt and issues of patient confidentiality played a role for some patients. CONCLUSIONS The number of events experienced by our respondents is lower than in previous studies for burglary, robbery, physical and sexual abuse (adults and children); the occurrence of accidents is similar. The majority of the people who experience traumatic events cope with them well enough without professional help. For those seeking help, the GP plays an important role. Care could be improved as follows: the GP should make it clear to patients that he/she can play a role in caring for them in the aftermath of a traumatic event and stress the confidential nature of the consultation. On the whole, GPs should be more supportive and attentive when being consulted about this topic; also patients would like their doctors to be more active in raising the subject, as well as in initiating follow-up.

Pauline A. P. Vilters-Van Montfort

Papers

Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder after non-traumatic events: evidence from an open population study

Traumatic events in a general practice population: the patient's perspective