scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Pavel Shvaiko published in 2016"

Proceedings Article•
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2016

[...]

Manel Achichi, Michelle Cheatham1, Zlatan Dragisic2, Jérôme Euzenat, Daniel Faria3, Alfio Ferrara4, Giorgos Flouris5, Irini Fundulaki5, Ian Harrow, Valentina Ivanova2, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz6, Elena Kuss, Patrick Lambrix2, Henrik Leopold7, Huanyu Li2, Christian Meilicke, Stefano Montanelli4, Catia Pesquita8, Tzanina Saveta5, Pavel Shvaiko, Andrea Splendiani9, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Konstantin Todorov, Cassia Trojahn10, Ondřej Zamazal •
Wright State University1, Linköping University2, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência3, University of Milan4, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas5, University of Oslo6, VU University Amsterdam7, University of Lisbon8, Novartis9, University of Toulouse10
18 Oct 2016
TL;DR: The OAEI 2016 campaign on ontology matching as mentioned in this paper was the first one to offer a set of test cases for ontologies of different nature (from simple thesauri to expressive OWL ontologies) and use different modalities, e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, or consensus.
Abstract: Ontology matching consists of finding correspondences between semantically related entities of two ontologies. OAEI campaigns aim at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can use ontologies of different nature (from simple thesauri to expressive OWL ontologies) and use different modalities, e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, or consensus. OAEI 2016 offered 9 tracks with 22 test cases, and was attended by 21 participants. This paper is an overall presentation of the OAEI 2016 campaign.

19 citations