scispace - formally typeset
P

Peter Bremen

Researcher at Radboud University Nijmegen

Publications -  12
Citations -  229

Peter Bremen is an academic researcher from Radboud University Nijmegen. The author has contributed to research in topics: Interaural time difference & Inferior colliculus. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 12 publications receiving 212 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter Bremen include RWTH Aachen University & Erasmus University Rotterdam.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Distribution of Interaural Time Difference in the Barn Owl's Inferior Colliculus in the Low- and High-Frequency Ranges

TL;DR: Recordings from the time-sensitive subnuclei of the barn owl's inferior colliculus show that the deviation of the representation of interaural time difference from optimal-coding models in the low-frequency range is attributable to the diminished importance of low frequencies for catching prey in this species.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pinna Cues Determine Orienting Response Modes to Synchronous Sounds in Elevation

TL;DR: It is shown that the auditory-evoked responses can be well explained by the idiosyncratic acoustics of the pinnae, and basic principles of target representation and selection for audition and vision appear to differ profoundly.
Journal ArticleDOI

Acquired prior knowledge modulates audiovisual integration.

TL;DR: In this article, a model of prior probability estimation of audiovisual congruency was used to test whether auditory and visual events do indeed emanate from the same object.
Journal ArticleDOI

Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency

TL;DR: It was found that pre-takeoff latency was longer for the latter stimulus than for baseline and that center frequency was a better predictor for landing precision than stimulus bandwidth, which fit well with what is known from head-turning studies and from neurophysiology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Applying double magnetic induction to measure two-dimensional head-unrestrained gaze shifts in human subjects.

TL;DR: The absence of irritating lead wires in the case of the DMI method leads to a higher guarantee of success (no coil breakage) and to less irritation on the subject's eye, which results in a longer and more comfortable measurement time.