P
Peter J. Millett
Researcher at Brigham and Women's Hospital
Publications - 386
Citations - 12233
Peter J. Millett is an academic researcher from Brigham and Women's Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Rotator cuff & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 58, co-authored 334 publications receiving 10276 citations. Previous affiliations of Peter J. Millett include American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine & Case Western Reserve University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair
Augustus D. Mazzocca,Peter J. Millett,Carlos A. Guanche,Stephen Santangelo,Robert A. Arciero +4 more
TL;DR: The single-row repair technique was similar to the double-row techniques in load to failure, cyclic displacement, and gap formation, and thedouble-row anchor repairs consistently restored a larger footprint than did thesingle-row method.
Journal ArticleDOI
Associated injuries in pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament tears: does a delay in treatment increase the risk of meniscal tear?
TL;DR: Evidence from this study supports the contention that associated injuries are common in young individuals with ACL tears and shows that a delay in surgical treatment was associated with a higher incidence of medial meniscal tears.
Journal ArticleDOI
Anatomical Glenoid Reconstruction for Recurrent Anterior Glenohumeral Instability With Glenoid Deficiency Using an Autogenous Tricortical Iliac Crest Bone Graft
TL;DR: Anomical reconstruction of the glenoid with autogenous iliac crest bone graft for recurrent glenohumeral instability in the setting of bone deficiency is an effective form of treatment for this problem.
Journal ArticleDOI
Treatment of clavicle fractures: current concepts review.
TL;DR: Current concepts of clavicle fracture management are discussed including surgical indications, techniques, and results.
Journal ArticleDOI
Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized clinical trials.
TL;DR: Single-row repairs resulted in significantly higher re-tear rates compared with double-row repair, especially with regard to partial-thickness re-Tears, however, there were no detectable differences in improvement in outcomes scores between single-row and double-Row repairs.